Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 14:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't build
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
[...]
Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd guess
the
easiest way to fix this would be to just request the removal of src:eglibc
from
sid.
It has already been removed as it can be seen in bug #753420. It's still
in the Sources files with Extra-Source-Only: yes, you should ignore
these packages when doing archive rebuilds.
It's still there because debian-installer from sparc is still using it.
I am therefore reassigning the bug to ftp.debian.org to ask for
debian-installer removal on sparc.
ftp-master mentioned on IRC that they'd like an explicit KiBi-{,n}ack on
this; CCing.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-11-24):
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 14:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't
build
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
[...]
Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd
guess the
easiest way to fix this would be to just request the removal of
src:eglibc from
sid.
It has already been removed as it can be seen in bug #753420. It's still
in the Sources files with Extra-Source-Only: yes, you should ignore
these packages when doing archive rebuilds.
It's still there because debian-installer from sparc is still using it.
I am therefore reassigning the bug to ftp.debian.org to ask for
debian-installer removal on sparc.
ftp-master mentioned on IRC that they'd like an explicit KiBi-{,n}ack on
this; CCing.
Looking at the eglibc vs. glibc thing, it seems to be it wouldn't cause
any troubles if debian-installer were to build again on sparc later,
since it would then pull the new glibc package as Extra-Source-Only:
yes? So there's no need to try and make sure it no longer builds there
(n-f-u or similar)?
In which case: yes, it looks to me old binaries can be removed.
[ Cc-ing debian-boot@ just in case. ]
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 01:42:17 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-11-24):
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 14:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't
build
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
[...]
Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd
guess the easiest way to fix this would be to just request the
removal of src:eglibc from sid.
It has already been removed as it can be seen in bug #753420. It's still
in the Sources files with Extra-Source-Only: yes, you should ignore
these packages when doing archive rebuilds.
It's still there because debian-installer from sparc is still using it.
I am therefore reassigning the bug to ftp.debian.org to ask for
debian-installer removal on sparc.
ftp-master mentioned on IRC that they'd like an explicit KiBi-{,n}ack on
this; CCing.
Yes. Thanks for the CC.
Looking at the eglibc vs. glibc thing, it seems to be it wouldn't cause
any troubles if debian-installer were to build again on sparc later,
since it would then pull the new glibc package as Extra-Source-Only:
yes? So there's no need to try and make sure it no longer builds there
(n-f-u or similar)?
In which case: yes, it looks to me old binaries can be removed.
[ Cc-ing debian-boot@ just in case. ]
I'll wait until tomorrow (Tuesday) to do the removal to give people at least a
little time to scream.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org control: retitle -1 RM: debian-installer [sparc] -- out of date, doesn't build On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: Source: eglibc Version: 2.17-97 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for ld... ld checking version of ld... 2.24.90, ok checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc... (cached) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7 checking version of x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7... 4.7.4, ok checking for gnumake... no checking for gmake... no checking for make... make checking version of make... 4.0, bad checking for gnumsgfmt... no checking for gmsgfmt... no checking for msgfmt... msgfmt checking version of msgfmt... 0.19.3, ok checking for makeinfo... : checking version of :... v. ?.??, bad checking for sed... sed checking version of sed... 4.2.2, ok checking for gawk... gawk checking version of gawk... 4.1.1, ok checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-nm... x86_64-linux-gnu-nm checking for autoconf... false checking whether false works... no configure: error: *** These critical programs are missing or too old: make *** Check the INSTALL file for required versions. debian/rules.d/build.mk:31: recipe for target '/tmp/buildd/eglibc-2.17/stamp-dir/configure_libc' failed make: *** [/tmp/buildd/eglibc-2.17/stamp-dir/configure_libc] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd guess the easiest way to fix this would be to just request the removal of src:eglibc from sid. It has already been removed as it can be seen in bug #753420. It's still in the Sources files with Extra-Source-Only: yes, you should ignore these packages when doing archive rebuilds. It's still there because debian-installer from sparc is still using it. I am therefore reassigning the bug to ftp.debian.org to ask for debian-installer removal on sparc. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770259: eglibc: FTBFS: These critical programs are missing or too old: make
Source: eglibc Version: 2.17-97 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for ld... ld checking version of ld... 2.24.90, ok checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc... (cached) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7 checking version of x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.7... 4.7.4, ok checking for gnumake... no checking for gmake... no checking for make... make checking version of make... 4.0, bad checking for gnumsgfmt... no checking for gmsgfmt... no checking for msgfmt... msgfmt checking version of msgfmt... 0.19.3, ok checking for makeinfo... : checking version of :... v. ?.??, bad checking for sed... sed checking version of sed... 4.2.2, ok checking for gawk... gawk checking version of gawk... 4.1.1, ok checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-nm... x86_64-linux-gnu-nm checking for autoconf... false checking whether false works... no configure: error: *** These critical programs are missing or too old: make *** Check the INSTALL file for required versions. debian/rules.d/build.mk:31: recipe for target '/tmp/buildd/eglibc-2.17/stamp-dir/configure_libc' failed make: *** [/tmp/buildd/eglibc-2.17/stamp-dir/configure_libc] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Given that src:eglibc is pretty much obsoleted by src:glibc now, I'd guess the easiest way to fix this would be to just request the removal of src:eglibc from sid. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
