Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. I vote A, FD. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: I vote A FD. On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: I vote A, FD. On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Keith Packard wrote: I vote A FD On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: I vote A, FD. The outcome is no longer in doubt: V: 1- don V: 1- steve V: 1- keith V: 1- bdale Option A decline to override Option FD Further discussion Option AFD === === Option A4 Option FD 0 The winners are: Option A decline to override I will announce the decision on -announce shortly. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com What, now? Soon equates to good, later to worse, Uagen Zlepe, scholar. Therefore, immediacy. -- Iain M. Banks _Look to Windward_ p 213 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: I call for votes on the following resolution regarding #770789: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. I vote A FD. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Good people are good because they've come to wisdom through failure. We get very little wisdom from success, you know. -- William Saroyan _My Heart's in the Highlands_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
I call for votes on the following resolution regarding #770789: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com I cannot find rest Because I am powerless To amend a broken world. -- Guy Gavriel Kay _Under Heaven_ p295 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 05:29:56PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: I call for votes on the following resolution regarding #770789: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. I vote A, FD. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: I call for votes on the following resolution regarding #770789: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== Please vote [A] for Decline to override, and [FD] for Further Discussion. I vote A FD -- keith.pack...@intel.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
This is just a draft: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== I suspect the options to be [A] Decline to override and [FD]. Does anyone object to proceeding? [If there are no objections from CTTE members or DDs, I will call for votes in 48 hours.] -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com A people living under the perpetual menace of war and invasion is very easy to govern. It demands no social reforms. It does not haggle over expenditures on armaments and military equipment. It pays without discussion, it ruins itself, and that is an excellent thing for the syndicates of financiers and manufacturers for whom patriotic terrors are an abundant source of gain. -- Anatole France -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770789: Draft of option for #770789
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:13:30AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: This is just a draft: ==BEGIN== In 770789, the Technical Committee was asked to override the decision of upstream and the maintainer of df to not include i in the units output when asked for IEC output (2^10). The CTTE declines to override the decision of the maintainer and upstream. ==END== I suspect the options to be [A] Decline to override and [FD]. Does anyone object to proceeding? [If there are no objections from CTTE members or DDs, I will call for votes in 48 hours.] No objection. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
