Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-26 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:34:27PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
 On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 20:20 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
  On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
   But. I don't think any modern kernel supports the efika, it was removed
   from the mainline kernel a while ago (summer 2012 it seems [0]) and was
   therefore removed from the installer on that basis too[1]
  
  thanks, I was looking for this information (as I saw in the jessie d-i 
  beta1 
  release notes that support for efikamx was removed, but I couldn't really 
  find 
  out why..) and then I saw this in the linux debian/changelog  from 3.11.5-1 
  from October 2013:
  
* [armhf] Remove mx5, omap and vexpress flavours. These are all supported
  by the multiplatform flavour.
  
  That sounded promising enough, so I gave upgrading a try...
 
 Yeah, mx5 general still works (AFAIK), it's just the efika stuff which
 has gone.

Note to self: add information from 
https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
(e.g. https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2014/20141005 to 
release notes.)
That would fix this bug, and more.

Bye,

Joost


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: src:linux,upgrade-reports
Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1
Severity: important

Dear maintainers,

I've just upgraded my Genesi EfikaMX nettop from wheezy to jessie and the only
package which wasn't upgraded was linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5, so I had to install
linux-image-armmp manually... I'm not really sure how to solve this sensibly,
suggesting that linux-image-armmp should provide linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 seems
strange. 

Besides that the upgrade when flawlessly, but the system only has 450 packages
installed anyway. But still, very neat! Just this...:

root@efikamx:~# apt-get install linux-image-armmp
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-3.16 debian-kernel-handbook fdutils
Recommended packages:
  irqbalance
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp linux-image-armmp
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 24.6 MB of archives.
After this operation, 104 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp 
armhf 3.16.7-ckt2-1 [24.6 MB
Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main linux-image-armmp armhf 
3.16+63 [5368 B]   
Fetched 24.6 MB in 7s (3394 kB/s)   
  
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp.
(Reading database ... 43566 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp_3.16.7-ckt2-1_armhf.deb ...
Unpacking linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp (3.16.7-ckt2-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-armmp.
Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-armmp_3.16+63_armhf.deb ...
Unpacking linux-image-armmp (3.16+63) ...
Setting up linux-image-3.16.0-4-armmp (3.16.7-ckt2-1) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-armmp
flash-kernel: deferring update (trigger activated)
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-flash-kernel:
flash-kernel: deferring update (trigger activated)
Setting up linux-image-armmp (3.16+63) ...
Processing triggers for flash-kernel (3.28) ...
flash-kernel: installing version 3.16.0-4-armmp
Generating kernel u-boot image... done.
Taking backup of uImage.
Installing new uImage.
Generating initramfs u-boot image... done.
Taking backup of uInitrd.
Installing new uInitrd.
Generating boot script u-boot image... done.
Taking backup of boot.scr.
Installing new boot.scr.
root@efikamx:~#

And now let's see how it reboots :-)

...

It didn't come back, will need to attach a serial console and see if I see
anything useful there...


cheers,
Holger

-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-4-mx5 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 
(Debian 4.6.3-14) ) #1 Debian 3.2.63-2+deb7u2

** Command line:
console=ttymxc0,115200 console=tty1 rootwait rw

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[1.634403] usb usb2: Product: Freescale On-Chip EHCI Host Controller
[1.640871] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 3.2.0-4-mx5 ehci_hcd
[1.646730] usb usb2: SerialNumber: mxc-ehci.1
[1.651779] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
[1.655586] hub 2-0:1.0: 1 port detected
[1.660144] mousedev: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
[1.666960] mc13xxx-rtc mc13892-rtc: rtc core: registered mc13892-rtc as rtc0
[1.674393] Registered led device: efikamx:green
[1.674512] Registered led device: efikamx:red
[1.674621] Registered led device: efikamx:blue
[1.675527] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[1.681119] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[1.685750] TCP cubic registered
[1.689003] NET: Registered protocol family 17
[1.693491] Registering the dns_resolver key type
[1.698283] VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant 
c rev 2
[1.707206] registered taskstats version 1
[1.711726] regulator_init_complete: VCAM: disabling
[1.716931] regulator_init_complete: VAUDIO: disabling
[1.722306] regulator_init_complete: VVIDEO: disabling
[1.727723] regulator_init_complete: VSD: disabling
[1.733070] mc13xxx-rtc mc13892-rtc: setting system clock to 2014-12-18 
15:30:20 UTC (1418916620)
[1.742030] Initializing network drop monitor service
[1.747919] Freeing init memory: 128K
[1.784810] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using mxc-ehci
[1.835537] udevd[46]: starting version 175
[1.959704] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0b95, idProduct=772a
[1.966519] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[1.973672] usb 1-1: Product: AX88x72A
[1.977464] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: ASIX Elec. Corp.
[1.982355] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 123456
[2.127645] imx-sdma imx35-sdma: firmware: agent aborted loading 

Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-18 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 19:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Package: src:linux,upgrade-reports
 Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1
 Severity: important
 
 Dear maintainers,
 
 I've just upgraded my Genesi EfikaMX nettop from wheezy to jessie and the only
 package which wasn't upgraded was linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5, so I had to install
 linux-image-armmp manually... I'm not really sure how to solve this sensibly,
 suggesting that linux-image-armmp should provide linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 seems
 strange. 

In the past we've done that via the metapackages, I thought via
linux-latest, but I can't see any evidence of that right now, so maybe
I'm confused..

But. I don't think any modern kernel supports the efika, it was removed
from the mainline kernel a while ago (summer 2012 it seems [0]) and was
therefore removed from the installer on that basis too[1]

 It didn't come back, will need to attach a serial console and see if I see
 anything useful there...

From what I gather this is not unexpected. I'm not sure why this
platform was removed upstream, but I expect lack of anyone willing to
maintain it and/or move it over to device tree might have been part of
it.

Around the time of the removal from the installer I did have a look
around for any plausible activity on that front and IIRC I didn't find
anything.

Sorry, I expect none of this was what you wanted to hear :-(

Ian.

[0]

commit c7c29b3aeb318b9efe3035cacf42800dfe2970f5
Author: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Date:   Wed Aug 1 12:49:30 2012 -0500

ARM: efikamx: remove Genesi Efika MX platform files from the tree

Delete the files that can no longer be built.

Signed-off-by: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org

commit 56a12b3984a368b1feab41a77f58fe81cc6771bf
Author: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Date:   Wed Aug 1 12:49:29 2012 -0500

ARM: efikamx: remove Genesi Efika MX from the i.MX v6/v7 defconfig

No need to have Efika MX listed in the defconfig if it can't be built.

Signed-off-by: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org

commit f60c99e22cae4d8761c86967a14e4621322c057e
Author: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Date:   Wed Aug 1 12:49:28 2012 -0500

ARM: efikamx: remove support for Genesi Efika MX from the build

Disable building for Efika MX boards by not having any configuration or
object file definitions.

Signed-off-by: Matt Sealey m...@genesi-usa.com
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2014/04/msg00279.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-18 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:20:16PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi Ian,
 
 thanks for the fast response!
 
 On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
  But. I don't think any modern kernel supports the efika, it was removed
  from the mainline kernel a while ago (summer 2012 it seems [0]) and was
  therefore removed from the installer on that basis too[1]
 
 thanks, I was looking for this information (as I saw in the jessie d-i beta1 
 release notes that support for efikamx was removed, but I couldn't really 
 find 
 out why..) and then I saw this in the linux debian/changelog  from 3.11.5-1 
 from October 2013:
 
   * [armhf] Remove mx5, omap and vexpress flavours. These are all supported
 by the multiplatform flavour.
 
 That sounded promising enough, so I gave upgrading a try...

I think that bug should be reassigned to the release notes.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. ballo...@debian.org

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-18 Thread Holger Levsen
control: reopen -1
control: reassign -1 release-notes
control: retitle -1 Efikamx plattform not supported in jessie anymore

On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
 I think that bug should be reassigned to the release notes.

Point taken, thanks.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#773467: efikamx: linux-image-3.2.0-4-mx5 is not upgraded to linux-image-armmp (and that one doesn't work)

2014-12-18 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 20:20 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi Ian,
 
 thanks for the fast response!
 
 On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
  But. I don't think any modern kernel supports the efika, it was removed
  from the mainline kernel a while ago (summer 2012 it seems [0]) and was
  therefore removed from the installer on that basis too[1]
 
 thanks, I was looking for this information (as I saw in the jessie d-i beta1 
 release notes that support for efikamx was removed, but I couldn't really 
 find 
 out why..) and then I saw this in the linux debian/changelog  from 3.11.5-1 
 from October 2013:
 
   * [armhf] Remove mx5, omap and vexpress flavours. These are all supported
 by the multiplatform flavour.
 
 That sounded promising enough, so I gave upgrading a try...

Yeah, mx5 general still works (AFAIK), it's just the efika stuff which
has gone.

   It didn't come back, will need to attach a serial console and see if I
   see anything useful there...
 
 I wonder if I should still bother...

With (AFAIK) no DTB file in existence it'd be something of a miracle if
it worked I'm afraid :-(

  From what I gather this is not unexpected. I'm not sure why this
  platform was removed upstream, [...]
  Sorry, I expect none of this was what you wanted to hear :-(
 
 Indeed, but thanks for explaining!
 
 I'll guess I'll go with owning another brick then ;-)

I did look for non-mainline community/kernel support a while back, but
it might be worth having another look before putting it in the attic.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org