Bug#779887: Useless PHP PEAR packages (Was: Bug#779887: Useless in Debian)

2015-04-26 Thread David Prévot
Control: severity -1 serious

Raising back the severity: if people are actually using or depend on any
of these packages, now may be a good time to say so before they get
removed (in the mean time, that should prevent automatic migration to
testing).

 On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 10:47:47AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:

  Please
  file a removal bug (for jessie or unstable, depending on what you think is
  best) for them in a few days.

I still intend to follow up with a removal request in a few months if
nobody objects (but feel free to beat me to it).

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#779887: Useless PHP PEAR packages (Was: Bug#779887: Useless in Debian)

2015-03-07 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 10:47:47AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
 Control: severity -1 important

 On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:22:40PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
  [Filled as RC to see it autoremoved from Jessie if nobody disagrees.
   Please, do downgrade it or tag it as sid + stretch if you disagree.]
 
 Thanks for doing these cleanups. However, as these bugs aren't interesting for
 people who are looking for RC bugs to fix, I downgraded them for now.

I hopped the bug title would have been explicit enough to not mess with
the RC-bug fix effort, at worst the two-line disclaimer on top of the
bug log would have been a click away.

  I intend to follow up with an RM request once Jessie gets released if
  nobody objects (but feel free to beat me to it).

 Please
 file a removal bug (for jessie or unstable, depending on what you think is
 best) for them in a few days.

As initially stated, I don’t intend to do so before Jessie gets
released [0]. If someone else shares the view that Jessie shouldn’t get
released with such packages, please file removal bugs in the mean time.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature