Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Ok, please go ahead now. To upload to unstable from experimental, just add a > changelog entry with "Upload to unstable" and an incremented version. Thank you, I have uploaded dolfin to unstable now. > Your only r-dep is fenics, which appears to be arch:all and ships an empty > package, so I don't know what all that's about... This is just an empty meta-package that will install all FEniCS components. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On 2015-05-12 09:30, Johannes Ring wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On 2015-05-12 09:07, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition (2) Remove dolfin from testing (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable This will be the correct solution IMO. I will do that now. No, please do NOT do that now. It is the correct long-term solution, but it will entangle the cgal transition. Wait until britney has a chance to sort it out. ok! Ok, please go ahead now. To upload to unstable from experimental, just add a changelog entry with "Upload to unstable" and an incremented version. Your only r-dep is fenics, which appears to be arch:all and ships an empty package, so I don't know what all that's about... -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2015-05-12 09:07, Johannes Ring wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 >>> transition. >>> >>> What are the options? >>> (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition >>> (2) Remove dolfin from testing >>> (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable >> >> >> This will be the correct solution IMO. I will do that now. >> > > No, please do NOT do that now. It is the correct long-term solution, but it > will entangle the cgal transition. > > Wait until britney has a chance to sort it out. ok! Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On 2015-05-12 09:07, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition (2) Remove dolfin from testing (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable This will be the correct solution IMO. I will do that now. No, please do NOT do that now. It is the correct long-term solution, but it will entangle the cgal transition. Wait until britney has a chance to sort it out. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 >> transition. >> >> What are the options? >> (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition >> (2) Remove dolfin from testing >> (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable > > This will be the correct solution IMO. I will do that now. Sorry for asking, but how should I upload to unstable when the package is already in experimental. I haven't done that before. Johannes > Johannes > >> (4) ...? >> >> (1) I don't know the details but it seems to me that this is not easy. >> >> (3) This causes another transition, but the only reverse dependencies of the >> binary packages of dolfin are python-viper (plus the meta packages fenics, >> science-mathematics and science-mathematics-dev). Rebuilding python-viper >> against dolfin 1.5.0-1 worked without problems. Maybe this additional >> transition >> isn't that bad (apart from the delay)? >> >> BTW does anyone understand why dolfin does not appear in the list of >> autoremovals? The bug is release-critical and not fixed in unstable/testing, >> only experimental. >> >> Joachim >> >> -- >> debian-science-maintainers mailing list >> debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. > > What are the options? > (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition > (2) Remove dolfin from testing > (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable This will be the correct solution IMO. I will do that now. Johannes > (4) ...? > > (1) I don't know the details but it seems to me that this is not easy. > > (3) This causes another transition, but the only reverse dependencies of the > binary packages of dolfin are python-viper (plus the meta packages fenics, > science-mathematics and science-mathematics-dev). Rebuilding python-viper > against dolfin 1.5.0-1 worked without problems. Maybe this additional > transition > isn't that bad (apart from the delay)? > > BTW does anyone understand why dolfin does not appear in the list of > autoremovals? The bug is release-critical and not fixed in unstable/testing, > only experimental. > > Joachim > > -- > debian-science-maintainers mailing list > debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
On 2015-05-11 22:35, Joachim Reichel wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition (2) Remove dolfin from testing (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable (4) ...? dolfin has a rdep in testing, so removing it isn't (yet) an option. (Although its rdep fenics isn't going to migrate either because it depends on the version of dolfin in experimental since six weeks... what a mess.) I've asked ftp-masters to decruft gdal making dolfin in sid uninstallable. Britney may be able to smooth-update gdal, in which case the transition can take place and the dolfin maintainers can fix the bug at their leisure. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition
Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition (2) Remove dolfin from testing (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from experimental to unstable (4) ...? (1) I don't know the details but it seems to me that this is not easy. (3) This causes another transition, but the only reverse dependencies of the binary packages of dolfin are python-viper (plus the meta packages fenics, science-mathematics and science-mathematics-dev). Rebuilding python-viper against dolfin 1.5.0-1 worked without problems. Maybe this additional transition isn't that bad (apart from the delay)? BTW does anyone understand why dolfin does not appear in the list of autoremovals? The bug is release-critical and not fixed in unstable/testing, only experimental. Joachim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
