Bug#780706: progress elsewhere
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 04:55:44AM +, Kashif Shah wrote: > Hi All, Hi Kashif, > Great to see all the progress being made over in salsa. I sent a request > to join the project as I can do some testing and possibly some bug fixing / > maintenance help. Please send an email to the Electronics Team list [1] explaining your reasons for requesting access to Salsa. Messages sent to this bug are not (necessarily) read by the Team since it doesn't own the package (yet). Be aware you do not need that kind of access to contribute via PRs and issues though. [1]: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net > Have you all seen https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923220 > ? The reported provided a script to automatically create a .deb package > from the .tar.xz on arduino.cc Thanks for the hint. I had not seen this ITP. I'll share my thoughts on it there. Regards, -- Rock Storm GPG KeyID: 4096R/C96832FD GPG Fingerprint: C304 34B3 632C 464C 2FAF C741 0439 CF52 C968 32FD signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#780706: progress elsewhere
Hi All, Great to see all the progress being made over in salsa. I sent a request to join the project as I can do some testing and possibly some bug fixing / maintenance help. Have you all seen https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923220 ? The reported provided a script to automatically create a .deb package from the .tar.xz on arduino.cc Best regards, Kashif On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:06:01 +0100 Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:27:15PM -0300, Ignacio Losiggio wrote: > > Before all this work i need to get running the package. I've forgot that i > > was removing unused files before building (macos/windows support). I know > > that having this in the debian/rules is really hackish. > > What's the correct way of removing a file from upstream? (compiling them > > generates unneeded dependencies and over-complicates the packaging). > > Seen the good question. > Further follow-up will be outside this bugreport. > > > Cheers > Geer Stappers > Who never told before that he uses the BR for status updates > >
Bug#780706: progress elsewhere
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:27:15PM -0300, Ignacio Losiggio wrote: > Before all this work i need to get running the package. I've forgot that i > was removing unused files before building (macos/windows support). I know > that having this in the debian/rules is really hackish. > What's the correct way of removing a file from upstream? (compiling them > generates unneeded dependencies and over-complicates the packaging). Seen the good question. Further follow-up will be outside this bugreport. Cheers Geer Stappers Who never told before that he uses the BR for status updates
