Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 09:58 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > unfortunately, I had no luck convincing the SRM to accept my proposed e > -d-s update in Jessie in #789429. I didn't even receive a singly reply > after ~2 months. Maybe one of you wants to try his luck with it? So, 8.2 has been released without even a single comment to this request. I am done with it. Feel free to reopen and try your luck. :/ - Fabian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
On 15/06/15 12:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push
this to jessie.
So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently
missing from the jessie branch in SVN, right?
emilio@tatooine:~/deb/pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data-server$ head -1
debian/changelog
evolution-data-server (3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2) unstable;
urgency=medium
AFAICS they are there.
What is the gbp import-dscs pendant in SVN?
Not sure about that.
Will it be possible to use jessie's evolution 3.12.9~ with e-d-s
3.12.11 or will this have to get updated in lockstep, too?
AFAIK that is fine. But you should give it some testing :)
If we go for 3.12.11 for Jessie, I will need some help to merge this
version into the jessie SVN branch.
OK.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates? You can try. It may depend on how big the debdiff is and on what kind of fixes it got (see NEWS). I think Jordi and Joss wanted to try to update to 3.12.11. Alternatively just provide a targeted debdiff. I put 3.12.11 in unstable precisely so that it gets a little testing, and I’d indeed like to see it in 8.2 if the diff is acceptable. -- Joss -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
On 15/06/15 10:46, Josselin Mouette wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates? You can try. It may depend on how big the debdiff is and on what kind of fixes it got (see NEWS). I think Jordi and Joss wanted to try to update to 3.12.11. Alternatively just provide a targeted debdiff. I put 3.12.11 in unstable precisely so that it gets a little testing, and I’d indeed like to see it in 8.2 if the diff is acceptable. OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push this to jessie. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push
this to jessie.
So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently
missing from the jessie branch in SVN, right?
What is the gbp import-dscs pendant in SVN?
Will it be possible to use jessie's evolution 3.12.9~ with e-d-s
3.12.11 or will this have to get updated in lockstep, too?
If we go for 3.12.11 for Jessie, I will need some help to merge this
version into the jessie SVN branch.
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
On 15/06/15 07:53, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi Emilio, Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data -server/. Use that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug against release.debian.org with a debdiff from jessie attached. will do so, thanks! Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates? You can try. It may depend on how big the debdiff is and on what kind of fixes it got (see NEWS). I think Jordi and Joss wanted to try to update to 3.12.11. Alternatively just provide a targeted debdiff. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Hi Emilio, Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data -server/. Use that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug against release.debian.org with a debdiff from jessie attached. will do so, thanks! Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates? Cheers, Fabian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Hi Fabian, On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:18:59 +0200 Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote: Dear pkg-evolution, this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails from being sent without evolution (and thus the user) taking any notice of it. It thus may cause (and already has for me) silent data loss. I really want to see this fixed in stable! I'd volunteer to do all the conversation with release.d.o and do the actual packaging and uploading. But I need assisstance with the appropriate branching and tagging of the package in SVN. It has been ages since I have done this last time. So, who would like to help me with this? There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data-server/. Use that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug against release.debian.org with a debdiff from jessie attached. To tag the package, do: svn-buildpackage --svn-only-tag Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)
Dear pkg-evolution, this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails from being sent without evolution (and thus the user) taking any notice of it. It thus may cause (and already has for me) silent data loss. I really want to see this fixed in stable! I'd volunteer to do all the conversation with release.d.o and do the actual packaging and uploading. But I need assisstance with the appropriate branching and tagging of the package in SVN. It has been ages since I have done this last time. So, who would like to help me with this? Thank you very much already! - Fabian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
