Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 ✓ These two migrated back as there's no RC bug on them. I've re-added the removal hint, but please file a bug. gitit aged, and the ppc64el binNMUs are now done. This should go in tonight if nothing else pops up. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: Re: Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
This may need a binNMU: haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4) Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group 9 days old (needed 5 days) libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-dev-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-dev-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-dev-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-dev-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-dev-0.15.3-77447 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-prof-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-prof-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-prof-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-prof-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-prof-0.15.3-77447 It looks like a binnmu for haskell-trifecta has already been scheduled on ppc64el but it's in BD-Uninstallable. haskell-trifecta build-depends on: - ppc64el:libghc-parsers-dev (= 0.12.1) ppc64el:libghc-parsers-dev depends on missing: - ppc64el:libghc-charset-dev-0.3.7.1-1690c It looks like haskell-parsers was not binnmud on ppc64el when it was binnmud on other architectures for a new version of haskell-charset. Checking dose.debian.net it appears it's build-depends are also uninstallable (though this information may be out of date). https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/1435122003/packages/haskell-parsers.html#8fad47a6199cea33228738dfa0983c1c src:haskell-parsers (0.12.1.1-3) [PTS] [ctrl] ? libghc-charset-dev (= 0.3) libghc-charset-dev (0.3.7.1-2+b1) [PTS] [ctrl] ? libghc-semigroups-dev-0.15.3-77447 MISSING Checking haskell-charset it appears it has been binnmu'd for the new semigroups on all architectures but the ppc64el build was built much later than the others.
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2015, 02:53 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: This may need a binNMU: haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4) Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group 9 days old (needed 5 days) libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-dev-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-dev-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-dev-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-dev-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-dev-0.15.3-77447 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-prof-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-prof-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-prof-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-prof-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-prof-0.15.3-77447 it had a binNMU waiting, but a binNMU on haskell-parsers was required to unblock this. Done. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 ✓ * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell-reflection+haskell-xml-conduitsuite=sida=mips,mipsel ✓ * And then the youngest upload (haskell-mono-traversable) needs to age (3 more days): https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-mono-traversable.html There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the release team gets impatient and age hints haskell-mono-traversable and gitit. https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html seems to contain only gitit (still waiting for the mips build) and false positives. pochu@franck:~$ head -5 hints/pochu #20150624 # #789365 age-days 3 haskell-mono-traversable/0.9.2.1-1 age-days 3 haskell-happstack-server/7.3.9-6 age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1 Let's see how that goes. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 ✓ * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell-reflection+haskell-xml-conduitsuite=sida=mips,mipsel ✓ * And then the youngest upload (haskell-mono-traversable) needs to age (3 more days): https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-mono-traversable.html There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the release team gets impatient and age hints haskell-mono-traversable and gitit. https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html seems to contain only gitit (still waiting for the mips build) and false positives. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 ✓ * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell-reflection+haskell-xml-conduitsuite=sida=mips,mipsel ✓ * And then the youngest upload (haskell-mono-traversable) needs to age (3 more days): https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-mono-traversable.html There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the release team gets impatient and age hints haskell-mono-traversable and gitit. https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html seems to contain only gitit (still waiting for the mips build) and false positives. This may need a binNMU: haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4) Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group 9 days old (needed 5 days) libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-dev-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-dev-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-dev-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-dev-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-dev-0.15.3-77447 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-charset-prof-0.3.7.1-1690c libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-comonad-prof-4.2.5-c2e64 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-lens-prof-4.6.0.1-21811 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-reducers-prof-3.10.3.1-db618 libghc-trifecta-prof/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends: libghc-semigroups-prof-0.15.3-77447 I have also added a few more age-days. Mostly missing gitit at this point. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1 You could grant piuparts a day to find new problems (and someone (hmm, probably me) to file bugs) :-) Anyway, that's yesterday's RC buggy version, a fixed -2 (the diff looks fine, but was not yet tortured with piuparts) was tagged in git not long ago. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 24/06/15 17:48, Andreas Beckmann wrote: There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1 You could grant piuparts a day to find new problems (and someone (hmm, probably me) to file bugs) :-) Anyway, that's yesterday's RC buggy version, a fixed -2 (the diff looks fine, but was not yet tortured with piuparts) was tagged in git not long ago. Right. I'll probably make the new version age-days 2 or so. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 24/06/15 17:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 24/06/15 17:48, Andreas Beckmann wrote: There was a problem with the gitit package, fixed by a swift upload of Clint right now. So the counter is back to 5, unless someone in the age-days 0 gitit/0.10.7-1 You could grant piuparts a day to find new problems (and someone (hmm, probably me) to file bugs) :-) Anyway, that's yesterday's RC buggy version, a fixed -2 (the diff looks fine, but was not yet tortured with piuparts) was tagged in git not long ago. Right. I'll probably make the new version age-days 2 or so. Or just let it be, as it was uploaded with urgency=high. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
Hi, another update. Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2015, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some aging, we could be good to go. The FTP team performed all the required removals and NEW processing, so that the ball is now in the release team’s field: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell-reflection+haskell-xml-conduitsuite=sida=mips,mipsel * And then the youngest upload (haskell-mono-traversable) needs to age (3 more days): https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-mono-traversable.html * And then, the transition might actually work automatically, thanks to the auto-hinter Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
On 23/06/15 15:05, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, another update. Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2015, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some aging, we could be good to go. The FTP team performed all the required removals and NEW processing, so that the ball is now in the release team’s field: * leksah ought to be removed from testing: https://bugs.debian.org/789521 Hinted. * Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell-reflection+haskell-xml-conduitsuite=sida=mips,mipsel * And then the youngest upload (haskell-mono-traversable) needs to age (3 more days): https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-mono-traversable.html * And then, the transition might actually work automatically, thanks to the auto-hinter Great, let's see how that goes. Thanks for the detailed updates! Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
Dear release team, a small update on this. Am Samstag, den 20.06.2015, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: * shake not building on powerpc Identified as a bug in ghc, test suite disabled. We now have weird test suite failing issues on kfreebsd-*, that seem to depend on the builder. But kfreebsd-* are no longer release architectures, right? So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some aging, we could be good to go. Greetings, Joachim -- -- Joachim nomeata Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release team, we (the Debian Haskell Group) has been working hard to get everything in order for GHC 7.8 to migrate to testing (and top open the way for 7.10 in unstable :-)). We have had regular status reports on the haskell mailing list. Now we are getting close enough for the migration to happen that I believe we should include you in status updates and notifications, and also because you can probably help. Please CC debian-hask...@lists.debian.org in mails to this bug, to keep everyone up-to-date. - From what I can tell, there are these blockers: * Packages in NEW Mostly gitit, which has an added binary file: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gitit_0.10.7-1.html The other two haskell packages in NEW do not seem to be testing relevant, so this is looking good. * Package removals There are a large number of Haskell package removales scheduled for unstable, but most of them are stalled, as there are still old binaries and sources depending on these packages. This is mostly due to sparc not keeping up, which is mostly due to nettle not building there: http://bugs.debian.org/789013 I’m not sure what to best do here. Since sparc is not a release architecture, this should not hold up the release, but technically it does. Maybe the removals can be added as hints to britney? Will that interact properly with the auto-hinter? * leksah Despite multiple calls on the mailing list, no contributor was willing and able to fix that package in reasonable time. I suggest you remove haskell-leksah and haskell-leksah-server from testing (on the grounds that the maintenance situation makes it not suitable for a Debian stable release). This should unblock this situation. * shake not building on powerpc This is a weird issue: https://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2015/06/msg00043.html As this is an almost leave package, I suggest to remove haskell-shake and haskell-hoogle on powerpc for now, and hence disentangle this problem from the transition. I’m still looking for volunteers to investigate this issue. * Other out of date packages, mostly mips and mipsel I keep watching https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html and I believe most problems are solved there. When today's upload and binNMUs have built everywhere there might be a package or two which no longer build on mips/mipsel (due to lack of TemplateHaskell support) and can be solved by a removal on these architectures. * Some packages need to age As usual. Is there a way for you, or better, me, to see if this list is exhaustive? Some kind of „what if when“ britney run where I can feed some removals and age-override hints and see what the auto-hinter+britney does? Thanks, Joachim - -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlWFP1EACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGwGRwCfadFimFcT8DQDlLWLOyYOQyI7 WKsAoKbqayqfnth3z5DWcvgRx3gnNGSP =OBHB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
