Bug#791965: Z-Wave Specs have been released to the public domain, standard opened up, could you re-evaluate packaging OpenZwave?

2016-09-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum 
On 01/09/16 at 22:30 +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
> 
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
> 
> > It seems the legal status of the Z-Wave stanard has vastly improved.
> > Could you please re-evaluate if packaging would be possible now?
> 
> thanks for informing me of this development. These are really good news and
> I will surely check what is possible now.
> 
> Thanks!
>  Thorsten
> 
> 
> @Lucas:
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openzwave/3rmb5a-IDWM
> > http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330383

Very nice!
My Debian bandwidth is quite limited currently due to the start of the
university year, but I'll try to take another look at packaging
openzwave soon.

Lucas

Bug#791965: Z-Wave Specs have been released to the public domain, standard opened up, could you re-evaluate packaging OpenZwave?

2016-09-01 Thread Thorsten Alteholz 

Hi Ralph,

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Ralph Aichinger wrote:


It seems the legal status of the Z-Wave stanard has vastly improved.
Could you please re-evaluate if packaging would be possible now?


thanks for informing me of this development. These are really good news 
and I will surely check what is possible now.


Thanks!
 Thorsten


@Lucas: 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openzwave/3rmb5a-IDWM
http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330383

Bug#791965: Z-Wave Specs have been released to the public domain, standard opened up, could you re-evaluate packaging OpenZwave?

2016-09-01 Thread Ralph Aichinger 
It seems the legal status of the Z-Wave stanard has vastly improved.
Could you please re-evaluate if packaging would be possible now? 

See e.g.:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openzwave/3rmb5a-IDWM
http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1330383

Thanks to everybody involved for the hard work in creating Debian
packages!

/ralph