Bug#798077: minidlna: segfault libc-2.19

[Diederik de Haas]

On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:15:10 +0300 Alexander Gerasiov  wrote:
> fixed 798077 1.1.4+dfsg-1
> thanks
> 
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:34:36 +0200 fhobbies  wrote:
> > after an update of packages without minidlna backport and rebooting
> > (and update of libc), the running is the same … crash. But
> > effectively after migration of minidlna to jessie-backports, the
> > process running without crash (segfault).
>
> Ok, then I mark this bug as fixed in 1.1.4+dfsg-1 and put the problem
> on hold until someone prove this is really critical and patch should be
> backported (security etc).

I guess this bug can be closed now?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#798077: minidlna: segfault libc-2.19

[Alexander Gerasiov]

fixed 798077 1.1.4+dfsg-1
thanks

Hello fhobbies,

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:34:36 +0200
fhobbies  wrote:

> Hello and thank for your reply (and sorry for my english)
> 
> i modify my configuration for keep stable version of system and keep
> jessie-backports for only minidlna package.
> 
> after an update of packages without minidlna backport and rebooting
> (and update of libc), the running is the same … crash. But
> effectively after migration of minidlna to jessie-backports, the
> process running without crash (segfault).
Ok, then I mark this bug as fixed in 1.1.4+dfsg-1 and put the problem
on hold until someone prove this is really critical and patch should be
backported (security etc).

> 
> Thanks a lot
> 
> > Le 7 sept. 2015 à 14:02, Alexander Gerasiov  a écrit :
> > 
> > severity 798077 normal
> > tags 798077 + moreinfo 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello fhobbies,
> > 
> > On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 10:58:21 +0200
> > fhobbies  wrote:
> > 
> >> Package: minidlna
> >> Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1.1+b3
> >> Severity: important
> >> 
> >> Dear Maintainer,
> >> 
> >> *** Reporter, please consider answering these
> >> questions, where appropriate ***
> >> 
> >> Sep  5 09:40:30 office kernel: [ 1424.466305] minidlnad[4600]:
> >> segfault at 8 ip 7f19819f1c8a sp 7ffe6af7b628 error 4 in
> >> libc-2.19.so[7f198197+19f000]
> > 
> > Dear reporter, please consider _answering_ these questions:
> >>   * What led up to the situation?
> >>   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> >> ineffective)?
> >>   * What was the outcome of this action?
> >>   * What outcome did you expect instead?
> >> 
> > 
> > Could you reproduce this bug with 1.1.4+dfsg-4 (from testing or
> > backports)?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Alexander Gerasiov
> > 
> > Contacts:
> > e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su  Homepage: http://gerasiov.net  Skype: gerasiov
> > PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1



-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su  Homepage: http://gerasiov.net  Skype: gerasiov
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1

Bug#798077: minidlna: segfault libc-2.19

[fhobbies]

Hello and thank for your reply (and sorry for my english)

i modify my configuration for keep stable version of system and keep 
jessie-backports for only minidlna package.

after an update of packages without minidlna backport and rebooting (and update 
of libc), the running is the same … crash.
But effectively after migration of minidlna to jessie-backports, the process 
running without crash (segfault).

Thanks a lot

> Le 7 sept. 2015 à 14:02, Alexander Gerasiov  a écrit :
> 
> severity 798077 normal
> tags 798077 + moreinfo 
> 
> 
> Hello fhobbies,
> 
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 10:58:21 +0200
> fhobbies  wrote:
> 
>> Package: minidlna
>> Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1.1+b3
>> Severity: important
>> 
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> 
>> *** Reporter, please consider answering these
>> questions, where appropriate ***
>> 
>> Sep  5 09:40:30 office kernel: [ 1424.466305] minidlnad[4600]:
>> segfault at 8 ip 7f19819f1c8a sp 7ffe6af7b628 error 4 in
>> libc-2.19.so[7f198197+19f000]
> 
> Dear reporter, please consider _answering_ these questions:
>>   * What led up to the situation?
>>   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>> ineffective)?
>>   * What was the outcome of this action?
>>   * What outcome did you expect instead?
>> 
> 
> Could you reproduce this bug with 1.1.4+dfsg-4 (from testing or
> backports)?
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Alexander Gerasiov
> 
> Contacts:
> e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su  Homepage: http://gerasiov.net  Skype: gerasiov
> PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1

Bug#798077: minidlna: segfault libc-2.19

[Alexander Gerasiov]

severity 798077 normal
tags 798077 + moreinfo 


Hello fhobbies,

On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 10:58:21 +0200
fhobbies  wrote:

> Package: minidlna
> Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1.1+b3
> Severity: important
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these
> questions, where appropriate ***
> 
> Sep  5 09:40:30 office kernel: [ 1424.466305] minidlnad[4600]:
> segfault at 8 ip 7f19819f1c8a sp 7ffe6af7b628 error 4 in
> libc-2.19.so[7f198197+19f000]

Dear reporter, please consider _answering_ these questions:
>* What led up to the situation?
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>  ineffective)?
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>* What outcome did you expect instead?
> 

Could you reproduce this bug with 1.1.4+dfsg-4 (from testing or
backports)?

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su  Homepage: http://gerasiov.net  Skype: gerasiov
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1

Bug#798077: minidlna: segfault libc-2.19

[fhobbies]

Package: minidlna
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1.1+b3
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these
questions, where appropriate ***

Sep  5 09:40:30 office kernel: [ 1424.466305] minidlnad[4600]: segfault at 8 ip
7f19819f1c8a sp 7ffe6af7b628 error 4 in
libc-2.19.so[7f198197+19f000]
   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages minidlna depends on:
ii  adduser  3.113+nmu3
ii  initscripts  2.88dsf-59
ii  libavformat566:11.4-1~deb8u1
ii  libavutil54  6:11.4-1~deb8u1
ii  libc62.19-18
ii  libexif120.6.21-2
ii  libflac8 1.3.0-3
ii  libid3tag0   0.15.1b-11
ii  libjpeg62-turbo  1:1.3.1-12
ii  libogg0  1.3.2-1
ii  libsqlite3-0 3.8.7.1-1+deb8u1
ii  libvorbis0a  1.3.4-2
ii  lsb-base 4.1+Debian13+nmu1

minidlna recommends no packages.

minidlna suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/minidlna changed:
START_DAEMON="yes"
CONFIGFILE="/home/fred/.minidlna/minidlna.conf"
USER="fred"
DAEMON_OPTS="-S"


-- no debconf information