Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish
"Adam D. Barratt"writes: > On 2015-10-15 7:35, Sharon Kimble wrote: > [...] >>> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote: "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > [...] >> rmadison emacs24 >> <��0 >> E��l9[)���fՀ���؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���E��q�J���Qa4 >> å��uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X� >>�@Ri0O��OAA�� >> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��" > Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>; >> >> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried >> upgrading to >> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still >> the >> same mishmash. > [...] > I'm unable to reproduce this: > [...] >> Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the >> mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please? > > I guess it's possible. rmadison won't be using any particular font of its own > accord though, it's just writing output to > the console. > I've just retried rmadison on my console of choice, "lxterminal", and rmadison is working perfectly. Its possible that my multiple reboots yesterday cleared the problem, so could you please close my bug report? Thanks, and sorry for the noise, in future, I'll try a reboot to see if it closes any problem! Thanks Sharon. -- A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk Debian 8.0, fluxbox 1.3.7, emacs 24.5.50.3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish
"Adam D. Barratt"writes: > [Was this intentionally not copied to the bug report?] No, it seems that my email proggie, "gnus", doesn't pick up the bug report address from your email. I do a "very wide reply and yank", which should just pick up every email address associated with the email, but it only picks up yours. Like it has done with this one, so I've hunted for the bug email address which I've included. > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote: >> "Adam D. Barratt" writes: >> >> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible >> > Control: severity -1 important >> > >> > On 2015-10-14 13:12, Sharon Kimble wrote: >> >> Package: devscripts >> >> Version: 2.15.9 >> >> Severity: grave >> >> Justification: renders package unusable >> > >> > An issue with a single script in the package does not render the whole >> > package unusable (even for an "important" >> > script). >> >> I could find no way for just reporting a bug with "rmadison", it seemed >> the only solution was to raise the bug against "devscripts". > > Nope, that's correct. It's a bug about devscripts, but it's not a > _grave_ bug about devscripts. > >> >> rmadison emacs24 >> >> <��0 >> >> E��l9[)���fՀ���؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���E��q�J���Qa4 >> >> å��uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X� >> >>�@Ri0O��OAA�� >> >> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��" > >> Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>; >> >> >> >> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried >> >> upgrading to >> >> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still >> >> the >> >> same mishmash. >> >> >> >> I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all >> >> debian >> >> repos. >> > >> > I'm unable to reproduce this: > [...] >> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:26:43 @~]$ [526]>; grep -i rmadison >> /etc/devscripts.conf >> # rmadison >> # RMADISON_URL_MAP_EXAMPLE=http://example.com/madison.cgi >> # RMADISON_DEFAULT_URL=debian >> # RMADISON_ARCHITECTURE is set. >> # RMADISON_ARCHITECTURE=source,i386,amd64,all >> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:26:47 @~]$ [527]>; env | grep -i proxy >> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:09 @~]$ [528]>; which rmadison >> /usr/bin/rmadison >> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:28 @~]$ [529]>; type rmadison >> rmadison is /usr/bin/rmadison >> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:46 @~]$ [530]>; > > That all looks reasonable enough as far as I can see. > > Regards, > > Adam Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please? Thanks Sharon. -- A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk Debian 8.0, fluxbox 1.3.7, emacs 24.5.50.3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish
On 2015-10-15 7:35, Sharon Kimble wrote: [...] On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote: "Adam D. Barratt"writes: [...] >> rmadison emacs24 >> <��0 >> E��l9[)���fՀ���؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���E��q�J���Qa4 >> å��uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X� >>�@Ri0O��OAA�� >> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��" > Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>; >> >> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried upgrading to >> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still the >> same mishmash. [...] > I'm unable to reproduce this: [...] Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please? I guess it's possible. rmadison won't be using any particular font of its own accord though, it's just writing output to the console. Regards, Adam
Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible Control: severity -1 important On 2015-10-14 13:12, Sharon Kimble wrote: Package: devscripts Version: 2.15.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable An issue with a single script in the package does not render the whole package unusable (even for an "important" script). rmadison emacs24 <��0 E��l9[)���fՀ���؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���E��q�J���Qa4 å��uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#������f����TC0��X� �@Ri0O��OAA�� H�%�����"����Bv������B7�h���%��%�y�4������"; This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried upgrading to the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still the same mishmash. I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all debian repos. I'm unable to reproduce this: adam@mowgli:~$ rmadison emacs24 debian: emacs24 | 24.4+1-4.1~bpo70+1 | wheezy-backports | source, amd64, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc emacs24 | 24.4+1-4.1 | sid | source, hurd-i386 emacs24 | 24.4+1-5 | jessie-kfreebsd | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 emacs24 | 24.4+1-5 | jessie | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x emacs24 | 24.5+1-2 | stretch | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x emacs24 | 24.5+1-2 | sid | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x new: adam@mowgli:~$ (2.15.3, on jessie amd64) Please provide the output of: - grep -i rmadison /etc/devscripts.conf - env | grep -i proxy - which rmadison - type rmadison Regards, Adam
Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish
Package: devscripts Version: 2.15.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, When trying to use "rmadison emacs24" I get this - rmadison emacs24 <��0 E��l9[)���fՀ���؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���E��q�J���Qa4 å��uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#������f����TC0��X� �@Ri0O��OAA�� H�%�����"����Bv������B7�h���%��%�y�4������"; This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried upgrading to the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still the same mishmash. I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all debian repos. Thanks Sharon. -- Package-specific info: --- /etc/devscripts.conf --- --- ~/.devscripts --- Not present -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages devscripts depends on: ii dpkg-dev 1.17.25 ii libc62.19-18+deb8u1 ii perl 5.20.2-3+deb8u1 ii python3 3.4.2-2 pn python3:any Versions of packages devscripts recommends: ii at 3.1.16-1 ii dctrl-tools 2.23 ii debian-keyring 2015.04.10 ii dput0.9.6.4 ii equivs 2.0.9 ii fakeroot1.20.2-1 ii file1:5.22+15-2 ii gnupg 1.4.18-7 ii libdistro-info-perl 0.14 ii libencode-locale-perl 1.03-1 ii libjson-perl2.61-1 ii liblwp-protocol-https-perl 6.06-2 ii libsoap-lite-perl 1.11-1 ii liburi-perl 1.64-1 ii libwww-perl 6.08-1 ii lintian 2.5.30+deb8u4 ii man-db 2.7.0.2-5 ii patch 2.7.5-1 ii patchutils 0.3.3-1 ii python3-debian 0.1.27 ii python3-magic 1:5.22+15-2 ii sensible-utils 0.0.9 ii strace 4.9-2 ii unzip 6.0-16 ii wdiff 1.2.2-1 ii wget1.16-1 ii xz-utils5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3 Versions of packages devscripts suggests: ii bsd-mailx [mailx]8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-2 ii build-essential 11.7 pn cvs-buildpackage pn debbindiff pn devscripts-el pn gnuplot ii gpgv 1.4.18-7 ii libauthen-sasl-perl 2.1600-1 ii libfile-desktopentry-perl0.07-1 ii libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.01-3 pn libterm-size-perl ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2 pn libyaml-syck-perl ii mutt 1.5.23-3 ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:6.7p1-5 pn svn-buildpackage ii w3m 0.5.3-19 -- no debconf information