Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish

2015-10-15 Thread Sharon Kimble
"Adam D. Barratt"  writes:

> On 2015-10-15 7:35, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> [...]
>>> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
 "Adam D. Barratt"  writes:
> [...]
 >> rmadison emacs24
 >> <��0
 >> E��l9[)���fՀ���֌؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���׹E��q�J���Qa4
 >> �uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X�
 >>�@Ri0O��OAA��
 >> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��"> Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>;
 >>
 >> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried 
 >> upgrading to
 >> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still 
 >> the
 >> same mishmash.
> [...]
 > I'm unable to reproduce this:
> [...]
>> Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the
>> mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please?
>
> I guess it's possible. rmadison won't be using any particular font of its own 
> accord though, it's just writing output to
> the console.
>
I've just retried rmadison on my console of choice, "lxterminal", and
rmadison is working perfectly. Its possible that my multiple reboots
yesterday cleared the problem, so could you please close my bug report?
Thanks, and sorry for the noise, in future, I'll try a reboot to see if
it closes any problem!

Thanks
Sharon.
-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk
TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk
Debian 8.0, fluxbox 1.3.7, emacs 24.5.50.3


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish

2015-10-15 Thread Sharon Kimble
"Adam D. Barratt"  writes:

> [Was this intentionally not copied to the bug report?]

No, it seems that my email proggie, "gnus", doesn't pick up the bug
report address from your email. I do a "very wide reply and yank", which
should just pick up every email address associated with the email, but it
only picks up yours. Like it has done with this one, so I've hunted for
the bug email address which I've included. 

>
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt"  writes:
>> 
>> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>> > Control: severity -1 important
>> >
>> > On 2015-10-14 13:12, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> >> Package: devscripts
>> >> Version: 2.15.9
>> >> Severity: grave
>> >> Justification: renders package unusable
>> >
>> > An issue with a single script in the package does not render the whole 
>> > package unusable (even for an "important"
>> > script).
>> 
>> I could find no way for just reporting a bug with "rmadison", it seemed
>> the only solution was to raise the bug against "devscripts".
>
> Nope, that's correct. It's a bug about devscripts, but it's not a
> _grave_ bug about devscripts.
>
>> >> rmadison emacs24
>> >> <��0
>> >> E��l9[)���fՀ���֌؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���׹E��q�J���Qa4
>> >> �uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X�
>> >>�@Ri0O��OAA��
>> >> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��"> >> Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>;
>> >>
>> >> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried 
>> >> upgrading to
>> >> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still 
>> >> the
>> >> same mishmash.
>> >>
>> >> I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all 
>> >> debian
>> >> repos.
>> >
>> > I'm unable to reproduce this:
> [...]
>> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:26:43 @~]$ [526]>; grep -i rmadison 
>> /etc/devscripts.conf
>> # rmadison
>> # RMADISON_URL_MAP_EXAMPLE=http://example.com/madison.cgi
>> # RMADISON_DEFAULT_URL=debian
>> # RMADISON_ARCHITECTURE is set.
>> # RMADISON_ARCHITECTURE=source,i386,amd64,all
>> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:26:47 @~]$ [527]>; env | grep -i proxy
>> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:09 @~]$ [528]>; which rmadison
>> /usr/bin/rmadison
>> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:28 @~]$ [529]>; type rmadison
>> rmadison is /usr/bin/rmadison
>> [boudiccas:Wed Oct 14 18:27:46 @~]$ [530]>; 
>
> That all looks reasonable enough as far as I can see.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam

Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the
mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please?

Thanks
Sharon.
-- 
A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk
TGmeds = http://www.tgmeds.org.uk
Debian 8.0, fluxbox 1.3.7, emacs 24.5.50.3


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish

2015-10-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 2015-10-15 7:35, Sharon Kimble wrote:
[...]

On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:32 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:

"Adam D. Barratt"  writes:

[...]

>> rmadison emacs24
>> <��0
>> 
E��l9[)���fՀ���֌؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���׹E��q�J���Qa4
>> �uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#��fTC0��X�
>>�@Ri0O��OAA��
>> H�%�"Bv��B7�h���%��%�y�4��"> Oct 14 13:09:17 @~]$ [489]>;
>>
>> This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried upgrading 
to
>> the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still the
>> same mishmash.

[...]

> I'm unable to reproduce this:

[...]

Is it possible that I have a corrupted font which is causing the
mish-mash? Do you know the font that "rmadison" uses please?


I guess it's possible. rmadison won't be using any particular font of 
its own accord though, it's just writing output to the console.


Regards,

Adam



Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish

2015-10-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important

On 2015-10-14 13:12, Sharon Kimble wrote:

Package: devscripts
Version: 2.15.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


An issue with a single script in the package does not render the whole 
package unusable (even for an "important" script).



rmadison emacs24
<��0
E��l9[)���fՀ���֌؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���׹E��q�J���Qa4
�uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#������f����TC0��X�
   �@Ri0O��OAA��
H�%�����"����Bv������B7�h���%��%�y�4������";

This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried 
upgrading to
the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still 
the

same mishmash.

I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all 
debian

repos.


I'm unable to reproduce this:

adam@mowgli:~$ rmadison emacs24
debian:
 emacs24 | 24.4+1-4.1~bpo70+1 | wheezy-backports | source, amd64, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, 
sparc

 emacs24 | 24.4+1-4.1 | sid  | source, hurd-i386
 emacs24 | 24.4+1-5   | jessie-kfreebsd  | source, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
 emacs24 | 24.4+1-5   | jessie   | source, amd64, arm64, 
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 emacs24 | 24.5+1-2   | stretch  | source, amd64, arm64, 
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 emacs24 | 24.5+1-2   | sid  | source, amd64, arm64, 
armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, 
mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

new:
adam@mowgli:~$

(2.15.3, on jessie amd64)

Please provide the output of:

- grep -i rmadison /etc/devscripts.conf
- env | grep -i proxy
- which rmadison
- type rmadison

Regards,

Adam



Bug#801770: devscripts: rmadison does not run properly but instead has a mishmash of rubbish

2015-10-14 Thread Sharon Kimble
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.15.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

When trying to use "rmadison emacs24" I get this -

rmadison emacs24
<��0
E��l9[)���fՀ���֌؇�{OK)��t7���}"�S�8�ە���1�ʹ�E��GA2�4z�p���׹E��q�J���Qa4
�uq(��J��0�Q(�+.IL�IE�9,�b#������f����TC0��X�
   �@Ri0O��OAA��
H�%�����"����Bv������B7�h���%��%�y�4������";

This is on a fresh install of jessie yesterday, 64bit. I've tried upgrading to
the version of devscripts in testing, but it makes no difference, still the
same mishmash.

I was hoping to see the output showing what version of emacs24 in all debian
repos.

Thanks
Sharon.




-- Package-specific info:

--- /etc/devscripts.conf ---

--- ~/.devscripts ---
Not present

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages devscripts depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev 1.17.25
ii  libc62.19-18+deb8u1
ii  perl 5.20.2-3+deb8u1
ii  python3  3.4.2-2
pn  python3:any  

Versions of packages devscripts recommends:
ii  at  3.1.16-1
ii  dctrl-tools 2.23
ii  debian-keyring  2015.04.10
ii  dput0.9.6.4
ii  equivs  2.0.9
ii  fakeroot1.20.2-1
ii  file1:5.22+15-2
ii  gnupg   1.4.18-7
ii  libdistro-info-perl 0.14
ii  libencode-locale-perl   1.03-1
ii  libjson-perl2.61-1
ii  liblwp-protocol-https-perl  6.06-2
ii  libsoap-lite-perl   1.11-1
ii  liburi-perl 1.64-1
ii  libwww-perl 6.08-1
ii  lintian 2.5.30+deb8u4
ii  man-db  2.7.0.2-5
ii  patch   2.7.5-1
ii  patchutils  0.3.3-1
ii  python3-debian  0.1.27
ii  python3-magic   1:5.22+15-2
ii  sensible-utils  0.0.9
ii  strace  4.9-2
ii  unzip   6.0-16
ii  wdiff   1.2.2-1
ii  wget1.16-1
ii  xz-utils5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3

Versions of packages devscripts suggests:
ii  bsd-mailx [mailx]8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-2
ii  build-essential  11.7
pn  cvs-buildpackage 
pn  debbindiff   
pn  devscripts-el
pn  gnuplot  
ii  gpgv 1.4.18-7
ii  libauthen-sasl-perl  2.1600-1
ii  libfile-desktopentry-perl0.07-1
ii  libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.01-3
pn  libterm-size-perl
ii  libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2
pn  libyaml-syck-perl
ii  mutt 1.5.23-3
ii  openssh-client [ssh-client]  1:6.7p1-5
pn  svn-buildpackage 
ii  w3m  0.5.3-19

-- no debconf information