Bug#805081: Please update liblastfm to 1.0.9

2015-11-17 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Hi!
> Hmm, I'm not sure how happy the ftp masters will be to have two exact
> copies of a source tarball just to simplify debian/rules, but I guess
> that's between you and them (or you and your sponsor).
You are right! I have to this in one package. Thank you for your hint!
> But yes, please take over maintenance of liblastfm.  It'd be good to
> have it in the hands of someone who feels more invested in the package.
Ok, I'll take over maintenance, update liblastfm to 1.0.9 and integrate
the building of Qt5 packages.

Stefan



Bug#805081: Please update liblastfm to 1.0.9

2015-11-16 Thread John Stamp
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:04:44AM PST, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thank you for your reply!
> > This is a little complicated because Amarok and Clementine both need
> > liblastfm compiled with Qt4.
> >
> > It looks like the latest version 1.1.0 (as yet untagged) allows for
> > coinstallation of the -dev files as well.  So it seems like the best way
> > forward is to upgrade to that version, and then have that source package
> > build both the Qt4 and Qt5 binaries.  It's doable, but you'd need to do
> > more by hand in debian/rules.
> Of course, I will not drop the Qt4 support. My idea is to create two
> separate packages. One package called "liblastfm" is Qt4 based and the
> other package "liblastfm5" is Qt5 based. And so it is very easy to
> handle the debian files.
> 
> My current Qt5 package (http://mentors.debian.net/package/liblastfm5) is
> patched for coinstallation. And so it is possible to install both
> package on the same system without a collision.
> > Would you be interested in taking over maintenance?
> Yes, I'm interested but I'm not a debian maintainer yet. I'm only a
> maintainer for the ubuntu PPA of tomahawk and I started my work on
> debian directly only a few weeks ago. And so I need a sponsoring for
> uploading at the moment.
> 
> I could take over maintenance, update the Qt4 version of liblastfm and
> uploading it to mentors.debian.net, if you wish.
> 
> Stefan

Hmm, I'm not sure how happy the ftp masters will be to have two exact
copies of a source tarball just to simplify debian/rules, but I guess
that's between you and them (or you and your sponsor).

But yes, please take over maintenance of liblastfm.  It'd be good to
have it in the hands of someone who feels more invested in the package.

John



Bug#805081: Please update liblastfm to 1.0.9

2015-11-16 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Hi,

thank you for your reply!
> This is a little complicated because Amarok and Clementine both need
> liblastfm compiled with Qt4.
>
> It looks like the latest version 1.1.0 (as yet untagged) allows for
> coinstallation of the -dev files as well.  So it seems like the best way
> forward is to upgrade to that version, and then have that source package
> build both the Qt4 and Qt5 binaries.  It's doable, but you'd need to do
> more by hand in debian/rules.
Of course, I will not drop the Qt4 support. My idea is to create two
separate packages. One package called "liblastfm" is Qt4 based and the
other package "liblastfm5" is Qt5 based. And so it is very easy to
handle the debian files.

My current Qt5 package (http://mentors.debian.net/package/liblastfm5) is
patched for coinstallation. And so it is possible to install both
package on the same system without a collision.
> Would you be interested in taking over maintenance?
Yes, I'm interested but I'm not a debian maintainer yet. I'm only a
maintainer for the ubuntu PPA of tomahawk and I started my work on
debian directly only a few weeks ago. And so I need a sponsoring for
uploading at the moment.

I could take over maintenance, update the Qt4 version of liblastfm and
uploading it to mentors.debian.net, if you wish.

Stefan



Bug#805081: Please update liblastfm to 1.0.9

2015-11-15 Thread John Stamp
Hi,

This is a little complicated because Amarok and Clementine both need
liblastfm compiled with Qt4.

It looks like the latest version 1.1.0 (as yet untagged) allows for
coinstallation of the -dev files as well.  So it seems like the best way
forward is to upgrade to that version, and then have that source package
build both the Qt4 and Qt5 binaries.  It's doable, but you'd need to do
more by hand in debian/rules.

It's been a while since this package mattered much to me.  Would you be
interested in taking over maintenance?

John



Bug#805081: Please update liblastfm to 1.0.9

2015-11-14 Thread Stefan Ahlers
Package: liblastfm
Version: 1.0.8-3
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

please update liblastfm to 1.0.9. The new release adds Qt5 compatibility
to liblastfm.

Friendly regards,
Stefan Ahlers