Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[積丹尼 Dan Jacobson]

reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
thanks

David, what kind of software are you using to make these reports?
Please mention it on bug 806378 and Cc me. Thanks!
I see the package name was listed, but the bug title is not.

> "DK" == David Kalnischkies  writes:
DK> Control: tag 805424 pending

DK> Hello,

DK> Bug #805424 in apt reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. 
You can
DK> see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

DK> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/diff/?id=15c0a78
DK> ---
DK> commit 15c0a78ce78d395586254d9685d0189714d0db2e
DK> Author: David Kalnischkies 
DK> Date:   Thu Nov 19 16:19:15 2015 +0100

DK> ignore lost+found in private directory cleanup

DK> In ce1f3a2c we started warning about failing unlinking, which we
DK> consistently do for directories. That isn't a problem as directories
DK> usually aren't in the places we do want to clean up – with the potential
DK> exeception of "lost+found", so lets ignore it like we ignore our own
DK> partial/ subdirectory.

DK> Closes: 805424

Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 01:32 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> thanks

Why? None of the messages that you're discussing are produced by the
BTS.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#805424: Bug#806378: Re: Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[Adam D. Barratt]

[oops; adding CC to #806378]

On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 18:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 01:32 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> > thanks
> 
> Why? None of the messages that you're discussing are produced by the
> BTS.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam

Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[積丹尼 Dan Jacobson]

> "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode  writes:

JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org

Any better place to reassign it?
Even if they are generated differently,
when they get to the user they look like they are coming from the same software.

Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[Julian Andres Klode]

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:01:50AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode  writes:
> 
> JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org
> 
> Any better place to reassign it?
> Even if they are generated differently,
> when they get to the user they look like they are coming from the same 
> software.

Sorry, no. You can file a support request on

https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=add_id=1=21

to at least get the default script in /usr/local/bin changed
though.

I'm thinking about merging both ways (changelog and commit
message) into one script, with an option to switch between the
two, and then get that installed into alioth's /usr/local/bin

Then everyone could hopefully switch to one script.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply
directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.

Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[Julian Andres Klode]

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:32:09AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> reassign 806378 bugs.debian.org
> thanks
> 
> David, what kind of software are you using to make these reports?
> Please mention it on bug 806378 and Cc me. Thanks!
> I see the package name was listed, but the bug title is not.

Almost everyone uses a different script. The default script is installed
as
/usr/local/bin/git-post-receive-tag-pending
on Alioth, for example.

We use a custom variant that works on commit messages instead of changelog
entries and has some more tweaks like including the package name in the
subject and the body of the email:

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/aliothscripts.git/tree/git-post-receive-tag-pending

(and some other tweaks inherited from the copy used by dpkg)

In contrast to everyone else, we include the package name in both subject
and title. You are right that it would make sense to include the bug
title in the subject (if that's what you were trying to say), but
this seems slightly complicated, although possible. It also means that
any push mentioning bugs will take 800 ms longer. Not sure if that's
worth it.

There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply
directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.

Bug#805424: in apt marked as pending

[積丹尼 Dan Jacobson]

> "JAK" == Julian Andres Klode  writes:
>> 
JAK> There's no point reassigning 806378 to bugs.debian.org
>> 
>> Any better place to reassign it?
>> Even if they are generated differently,
>> when they get to the user they look like they are coming from the same 
>> software.

JAK> Sorry, no. You can file a support request on

JAK> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=add_id=1=21

JAK> to at least get the default script in /usr/local/bin changed
JAK> though.

JAK> I'm thinking about merging both ways (changelog and commit
JAK> message) into one script, with an option to switch between the
JAK> two, and then get that installed into alioth's /usr/local/bin

JAK> Then everyone could hopefully switch to one script.

OK. I tried to register for an account there, but it said Unix name
already taken (jidanni).

I pressed password recovery, and it said username doesn't exist.

I would rather like to leave that machine to be the territory of
developers, and just wish to relay my feedback to you and have you guys
take care of the rest.