Bug#806666: Should advene be removed?
reassign 80 ftp.debian.org retitle 80 RM: advene: depends on gstreamer 0.10 thanks On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:35:34PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 02:42:07PM +0100, Olivier Aubert wrote: > > I am the upstream maintainer of Advene. The project is not abandoned, > > but the port to gtk3 + gstreamer 1.0 is not simply trivial, and needs > > more time than I can invest right now. It is still in my todo list, but > > it will not be ready for the next Debian release. > > > > It is indeed already removed from testing (see #785818). > > Ok, if it won't be fixed before the stretch release, then let's remove it > from unstable for now (it can be re-introduced once fixed upstream). > > We're also aiming for removal of the reverse dependencies from > unstable at this point. Reassignng to ftp.debian.org. advene can be reintroduced when it has been ported to gstreamer 1.0 Cheers, Moritz
Bug#806666: Should advene be removed?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 02:42:07PM +0100, Olivier Aubert wrote: > I am the upstream maintainer of Advene. The project is not abandoned, > but the port to gtk3 + gstreamer 1.0 is not simply trivial, and needs > more time than I can invest right now. It is still in my todo list, but > it will not be ready for the next Debian release. > > It is indeed already removed from testing (see #785818). Ok, if it won't be fixed before the stretch release, then let's remove it from unstable for now (it can be re-introduced once fixed upstream). We're also aiming for removal of the reverse dependencies from unstable at this point. Cheers, Moritz
Bug#806666: Should advene be removed?
I am the upstream maintainer of Advene. The project is not abandoned, but the port to gtk3 + gstreamer 1.0 is not simply trivial, and needs more time than I can invest right now. It is still in my todo list, but it will not be ready for the next Debian release. It is indeed already removed from testing (see #785818). Cheers, Olivier On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 21:43 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: advene > Severity: serious > > Should advene be removed? It depends on gstreamer 0.10, which is > scheduled removal (plus, other legacy libs (python-rsvg and > python-goocanvas), this is unfixed upstream (last commit 15 months > ago) and popcon is marginal. > > Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to > ftp.debian.org for removal. > > Cheers, > Moritz > > ___ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedi > a-maintainers
Bug#806666: Should advene be removed?
Package: advene Severity: serious Should advene be removed? It depends on gstreamer 0.10, which is scheduled removal (plus, other legacy libs (python-rsvg and python-goocanvas), this is unfixed upstream (last commit 15 months ago) and popcon is marginal. Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to ftp.debian.org for removal. Cheers, Moritz
