Bug#811090: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#811090: libgdiplus: cannot install package

2016-01-16 Thread Sami Kallio
apt-cache policy libgdiplus: 

libgdiplus:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate:   3.12-0xamarin1
  Version table:
 3.12-0xamarin1 0
500 http://download.mono-project.com/repo/debian/ wheezy/main i386 
Packages
 3.6-1+b2 0
500 http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  

Bug#811090: libgdiplus: cannot install package

2016-01-15 Thread Sami Kallio
Package: libgdiplus
Version: 3.12-0xamarin1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

* What led up to the situation?
I tried to install simple drawing program "Pinta", which depends on (among
others) libgdiplus.

* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
I typed "sudo aptitude install pinta" to terminal emulator, but aptitude
refused to install pinta as it
depends on libgdiplus, which couldn't be installed, because libgdiplus depends
on libjpeg8 (>= 8c), which  doesn't seem to exist in Debian repositories.

* What was the outcome of this action?
Pinta was not installed

* What outcome did you expect instead?
That pinta would be installed



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-586
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#811090: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#811090: libgdiplus: cannot install package

2016-01-15 Thread Jo Shields


On 15/01/16 15:20, Sami Kallio wrote:
> Package: libgdiplus
> Version: 3.12-0xamarin1
> Severity: important
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> * What led up to the situation?
> I tried to install simple drawing program "Pinta", which depends on (among
> others) libgdiplus.
> 
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
> I typed "sudo aptitude install pinta" to terminal emulator, but aptitude
> refused to install pinta as it
> depends on libgdiplus, which couldn't be installed, because libgdiplus depends
> on libjpeg8 (>= 8c), which  doesn't seem to exist in Debian repositories.
> 
> * What was the outcome of this action?
> Pinta was not installed
> 
> * What outcome did you expect instead?
> That pinta would be installed

apt-cache policy libgdiplus