Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 
Thanks for pushing for that, it is great! 

Le 10 août 2016 21:35:17 GMT+02:00, Chris Lamb  a écrit :
>> > 3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
>>
>> Yes :)
>
>Thanks for uploading!
>
>
>Regards,
>
>-- 
>  ,''`.
> : :'  : Chris Lamb
> `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
>   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Lamb 
> > 3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
>
> Yes :)

Thanks for uploading!


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 

Le 10/08/2016 à 19:34, Chris Lamb a écrit :

Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!


3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!


Regards,


Yes :)

S

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Lamb 
> Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!

3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 

Le 04/08/2016 à 23:02, Chris Lamb a écrit :

Sylvestre Ledru wrote:


Uploaded!


ACCEPTED.


Regards,


Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!

Thanks
S

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Chris Lamb 
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:

> Uploaded! 

ACCEPTED.


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 
Uploaded! 

Le 4 août 2016 18:08:23 GMT+02:00, Chris Lamb  a écrit :
>> > I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from
>the
>> > angles of:
>[..]
>> why not :)
>> The lib is 250k
>
>Also, it would keep any bug reports separate. Let me know when you
>upload
>it so I can get it through NEW asap..
>
>
>Regards,
>
>-- 
>  ,''`.
> : :'  : Chris Lamb
> `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
>   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Chris Lamb 
> > I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
> > angles of:
[..]
> why not :)
> The lib is 250k

Also, it would keep any bug reports separate. Let me know when you upload
it so I can get it through NEW asap..


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 

Le 04/08/2016 à 17:07, Chris Lamb a écrit :

For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev


Oh neat (sid!) - I would almost have been happy enough with it being
in experimental but this is much better.

I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
angles of:

 * "Hey how come I don't have libFuzzer but I have llvm-3.8-dev"

 * Marketing.

why not :)
The lib is 250k

S

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Chris Lamb 
> For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev

Oh neat (sid!) - I would almost have been happy enough with it being
in experimental but this is much better.

I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
angles of:

 * "Hey how come I don't have libFuzzer but I have llvm-3.8-dev"

 * Marketing.

Thoughts?


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-08-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 

Le 30/07/2016 à 20:39, Chris Lamb a écrit :

Should not be too hard to integrate, having a look!


Let me know if/when there is something to test. :)

Implemented locally, I will try to upload it in the next few days :)
For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev (don't hesitate if you see a 
better place).

Thanks for the ping, it is a good addition.

S

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-07-30 Thread Chris Lamb 
> Should not be too hard to integrate, having a look!

Let me know if/when there is something to test. :)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-07-29 Thread Sylvestre Ledru 
Le 29/07/2016 à 08:17, Chris Lamb a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> llvm: libfuzzer
> Any movement on this? I was shown a cool demo yesterday by the upstream 
> author and its a bit of a pain to get going in Debian. This feels a shame as 
> all the sources are there, we just need to do something like:
>
>  $ clang++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++11 Fuzzer/*.cpp -IFuzzer
>  $ ar ruv libFuzzer.a Fuzzer*.o
>
> :)
>
Should not be too hard to integrate, having a look!
S

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-07-29 Thread Chris Lamb 
Hi,

> llvm: libfuzzer

Any movement on this? I was shown a cool demo yesterday by the upstream author 
and its a bit of a pain to get going in Debian. This feels a shame as all the 
sources are there, we just need to do something like:

 $ clang++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++11 Fuzzer/*.cpp -IFuzzer
 $ ar ruv libFuzzer.a Fuzzer*.o

:)


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

Bug#820159: llvm: libfuzzer

2016-04-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx 
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.8
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

As part of llvm there is a libfuzzer, see
http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html.  

You actually have the sources of it as part of the various llvm
toolchain packages, but it doesn't seem like it's build.

The library doesn't really depend on llvm, and is useful for
writing the fuzzers.

Could you consider shipping a static version of the library in a
package?  Or do you prefer a package that's not part of the llvm
toolchain source packages?


Kurt