Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> On 23 March 2017 at 12:28, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, it will be fixed this month. We've got a strategy that'll work for
>> > the
>> > primary usecases - using little-endian everywhere.
>>
>> Progress?
>>
>> At this point this has been the last package stuck in a library
>> transition (ignoring openssl), and we are in deep freeze.
>>
>> I think a fix is highly overdue.
>
> So sorry, I completely forgot there was a dependency bug. I've committed a
> simple test disabler, because we don't need HFST to pass those tests any
> longer.
>
> The actual issue was fixed in https://bugs.debian.org/824119 - since
> hfst-ospell no longer depends on HFST, HFST doesn't need to run tests.
>
> Kartik, can you push it onwards?
If I understand correctly, I need to push hfst-ospell, right?
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On 23 March 2017 at 12:28, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Yes, it will be fixed this month. We've got a strategy that'll work for > the > > primary usecases - using little-endian everywhere. > > Progress? > > At this point this has been the last package stuck in a library > transition (ignoring openssl), and we are in deep freeze. > > I think a fix is highly overdue. So sorry, I completely forgot there was a dependency bug. I've committed a simple test disabler, because we don't need HFST to pass those tests any longer. The actual issue was fixed in https://bugs.debian.org/824119 - since hfst-ospell no longer depends on HFST, HFST doesn't need to run tests. Kartik, can you push it onwards? -- Tino Didriksen
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:49:37AM +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 4 November 2016 at 20:49, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > > While it did successfully build in the past, that was only because the > > test > > > > suite was disabled until recently. The tests revealed the unsigned char > > > > issue which was easy to fix, and now the endian issue which will not > > be as > > > > easy. > > > > Any news? > > > Yes, it will be fixed this month. We've got a strategy that'll work for the > primary usecases - using little-endian everywhere. Progress? At this point this has been the last package stuck in a library transition (ignoring openssl), and we are in deep freeze. I think a fix is highly overdue. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On 4 November 2016 at 20:49, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > While it did successfully build in the past, that was only because the > test > > > suite was disabled until recently. The tests revealed the unsigned char > > > issue which was easy to fix, and now the endian issue which will not > be as > > > easy. > > Any news? Yes, it will be fixed this month. We've got a strategy that'll work for the primary usecases - using little-endian everywhere. -- Tino Didriksen
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
Hi, On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 06:42:04PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:03:20 +0200 Tino Didriksen wrote: > > On 13 June 2016 at 18:00, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > > > > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the > > > past) > > > > > > Thanks for taking care of the twolc errors I reported in #826659. The > > > twolc test now succeeds on little-endian systems, and no longer hangs > > > anywhere, but still fails on big-endian architectures (mips, powerpc, > > > s390x, and several non-release architectures). I don't have further > > > details, but perhaps you can reproduce the problem on a porterbox. > > > Could you please take a look? > > > > > > Can reproduce. Looking into it upstream: > > https://github.com/hfst/hfst/issues/328 > > > > While it did successfully build in the past, that was only because the test > > suite was disabled until recently. The tests revealed the unsigned char > > issue which was easy to fix, and now the endian issue which will not be as > > easy. Any news? -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:03:20 +0200 Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 18:00, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the > > past) > > > > Thanks for taking care of the twolc errors I reported in #826659. The > > twolc test now succeeds on little-endian systems, and no longer hangs > > anywhere, but still fails on big-endian architectures (mips, powerpc, > > s390x, and several non-release architectures). I don't have further > > details, but perhaps you can reproduce the problem on a porterbox. > > Could you please take a look? > > > Can reproduce. Looking into it upstream: > https://github.com/hfst/hfst/issues/328 > > While it did successfully build in the past, that was only because the test > suite was disabled until recently. The tests revealed the unsigned char > issue which was easy to fix, and now the endian issue which will not be as > easy. Hi, Any progress on this? Thanks, Emilio
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
On 13 June 2016 at 18:00, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the > past) > > Thanks for taking care of the twolc errors I reported in #826659. The > twolc test now succeeds on little-endian systems, and no longer hangs > anywhere, but still fails on big-endian architectures (mips, powerpc, > s390x, and several non-release architectures). I don't have further > details, but perhaps you can reproduce the problem on a porterbox. > Could you please take a look? Can reproduce. Looking into it upstream: https://github.com/hfst/hfst/issues/328 While it did successfully build in the past, that was only because the test suite was disabled until recently. The tests revealed the unsigned char issue which was easy to fix, and now the endian issue which will not be as easy. -- Tino Didriksen
Bug#827199: hfst: FTBFS: twolc test fails on big-endian systems
Source: hfst Version: 3.10.0~r2798-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Thanks for taking care of the twolc errors I reported in #826659. The twolc test now succeeds on little-endian systems, and no longer hangs anywhere, but still fails on big-endian architectures (mips, powerpc, s390x, and several non-release architectures). I don't have further details, but perhaps you can reproduce the problem on a porterbox. Could you please take a look? Thanks!
