Bug#828267: citadel: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Christoph Biedl]

tags 828267 patch
thanks

Well, let's put an end to this. The old libssl is back, so the patch
attached uses it and also partially reverts the change in 902-1, build
passes again now.

This is of course band-aid but sufficient for the stretch release, and
there's a good chance upstream will follow the OpenSSL switch during
the buster development cycle.

Cheers,
Christoph

diff -u citadel-902/debian/changelog citadel-902/debian/changelog
--- citadel-902/debian/changelog
+++ citadel-902/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+citadel (902-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Use SSL compability library. Closes: #828267, #846543
+
+ -- Christoph Biedl   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 
23:05:13 +0100
+
 citadel (902-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Use SSL compatibility API. (Closes: #828267)
diff -u citadel-902/debian/control citadel-902/debian/control
--- citadel-902/debian/control
+++ citadel-902/debian/control
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Wilfried Goesgens , Michael Meskes 
, Alexander Wirt 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), po-debconf, quilt, bison, autotools-dev, 
  libdb-dev, libexpat1-dev, libical-dev (>= 2.0.0), libldap2-dev, 
libncurses5-dev,
- libpam0g-dev, libsieve2-dev, libssl-dev, libcitadel-dev (>= 902),
+ libpam0g-dev, libsieve2-dev, libssl1.0-dev, libcitadel-dev (>= 902),
  libcurl4-openssl-dev (>> 7.25), zlib1g-dev, libev-dev (>= 4.0), libc-ares-dev 
(>= 1.7.2)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-citadel/citadel.git
diff -u citadel-902/debian/rules citadel-902/debian/rules
--- citadel-902/debian/rules
+++ citadel-902/debian/rules
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 
 LDFLAGS_DEF = `dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS`
 CPPFLAGS_DEF = `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS`
-CPPFLAGS += -DOPENSSL_API_COMPAT=0x1010L
 
 EXTRA_ARGS=
 PROFILE_ARGS=


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#828267: citadel: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

[Kurt Roeckx]

Source: citadel
Version: 902-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/citadel_902-1_amd64-20160529-1410

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt