Bug#828359: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#828359: iva: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Sascha Steinbiss 
Hi Kurt,

thanks for the rebuild and for reporting this FTBFS.

> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/iva_1.0.6+ds-1_amd64-20160529-1432

I was curious indeed when I saw iva fail, given that it does not use OpenSSL at 
all.
Investigation of the build log led me to believe that the cause of this is a 
problem with Python’s multiprocessing module in pbuilder runs, which I suspect 
is connected to /dev/shm not being writable. This is a problem that also occurs 
in the rebuilds done by the Reproducible Builds folks [1].

> If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.

I am not sure if I can just close this bug as it does not relate to OpenSSL and 
I should probably file a bug indicating this pbuilder associated issue.

Thanks and best regards,
Sascha

[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/iva.html

Bug#828359: iva: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx 
Source: iva
Version: 1.0.6+ds-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/iva_1.0.6+ds-1_amd64-20160529-1432

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt