Bug#828561: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#828561: Bug#828561: strongswan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Source: strongswan > > Version: 5.4.0-1 > > Severity: important > > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > > > Hi, > > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: > > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/strongswan_5.4.0-1_amd64-20160529-1540 > > > > On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various > > of the > > reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at > > https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful > > information. > > > > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a > > recent > > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything > > works. > > > > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. > Hey, > > I've reported this upstream, and they provided a patch which I'm gonna > try against current OpenSSL and 1.1.0 to be sure. Not sure when I'll > have time but I'll keep you posted. But the patch doesn't apply to 5.4.0 and 5.5 is due in 13 days. I don't think it's really worth backporting it so I'll do some local tests but won't upload anything before 5.5.0. I hope the timeframes will be compatible but there might be some FTBFS at one point. I guess if we really need to remove strongSwan 5.4 from testing at one point to allow openssl 1.1.0 to migrate, it's ok (although we're not here yet). Regards. -- Yves-Alexis Perez signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#828561: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#828561: strongswan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:24:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Source: strongswan > Version: 5.4.0-1 > Severity: important > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/strongswan_5.4.0-1_amd64-20160529-1540 > > On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of > the > reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at > https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful > information. > > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. > > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Hey, I've reported this upstream, and they provided a patch which I'm gonna try against current OpenSSL and 1.1.0 to be sure. Not sure when I'll have time but I'll keep you posted. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis Perez signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#828561: strongswan: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Source: strongswan Version: 5.4.0-1 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/strongswan_5.4.0-1_amd64-20160529-1540 On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt
