control: severity -1 serious
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:56:57 +0300 Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Source: ruby2.3
> Version: 2.3.1-5
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
> Latest version of libgdbm(1.12) in experimental have new SONAME and
> separates away dbm_* interface in libgdbm-compat4 binary package.
>
> As such, it is transition, and I have to make sure, that reverse
> dependencies are okay. Most of them was trivial to fix -- just build-depend
> on libgdbm-compat-dev, but ruby2.3 proved to be harder.
>
> Here is snippet from test suite, when building aganist gdbm/experimental:
>
> TestGDBM#test_s_open_nolock:
> GDBMError: Bad magic number
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:190:in `open'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:190:in `block
> (2 levels) in test_s_open_nolock'
>
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/lib/test/unit/assertions.rb:171:in
> `assert_nothing_raised'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:189:in `block
> in test_s_open_nolock'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:152:in `block
> in open_db_child'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:149:in `popen'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:149:in
> `open_db_child'
> /home/user/stuff/ruby2.3-2.3.1/test/gdbm/test_gdbm.rb:188:in
> `test_s_open_nolock'
>
> I barely read Ruby and it is hard for me to debug this issue, and, as
> ruby package maintainer, you are more competent than me at it. Would
> you be so kind to try build ruby aganist gdbm/experimental and see why
> this test fails?
>
>
it is now serious
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature