Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
On 05/10/16 00:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 04/10/16 19:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >>> Hi Sylvestre, >>> >>> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. > This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: > * takes too much time > * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release > * 3.7 is no longer maintained > * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive > * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8=sid >>> >>> Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the >>> call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on >>> armel. >>> Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. >>> Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. >>> >>> So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me >>> know >>> when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. >> Done! > > clamav freemat gnome-builder and libclang-perl binNMUed. clamav and freemat fail to build against LLVM 3.8. They have bug reports. Emilio
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
On 04/10/16 19:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> Hi Sylvestre, >> >> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: * takes too much time * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release * 3.7 is no longer maintained * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 >>> >>> Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: >>> >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8=sid >> >> Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the >> call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on >> armel. >> Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. >> Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. >> >> So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me know >> when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. > Done! clamav freemat gnome-builder and libclang-perl binNMUed. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre, > > On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: normal >>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >>> Usertags: transition >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. >>> This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: >>> * takes too much time >>> * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release >>> * 3.7 is no longer maintained >>> * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive >>> * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 >> >> Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8=sid > > Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the > call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on armel. > Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. > Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. > > So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me know > when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. Done! Many thanks, Sylvestre
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
Hi Sylvestre, On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> Hello, >> >> This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. >> This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: >> * takes too much time >> * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release >> * 3.7 is no longer maintained >> * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive >> * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 > > Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8=sid Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on armel. Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me know when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. Thanks, Emilio
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.8.html I have updated the tracker we already had for llvm 3.6. Emilio
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. > This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: > * takes too much time > * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release > * 3.7 is no longer maintained > * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive > * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8=sid Cheers, Emilio
Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: * takes too much time * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release * 3.7 is no longer maintained * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 Ben file: title = "llvm-defaults-3.8"; is_affected = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5|clang1-3.6|libllvm3.6)" | .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.8|libllvm3.8)"; is_good = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.8|libllvm3.8)"; is_bad = .depends ~ "lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5|clang1-3.6|libllvm3.6)"; -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
