Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
Hi Tim, Thanks for the quick uploads to jessie-backports. Regarding the sponsorship process, I think RFS bugs are always closed manually by the sponsoring DD, rather than by editing the changelog after the sponsorship request. I have now force-pushed updated debian/ tags; in case you kept copies of the repositories on your local machine, you can update them with `git fetch --tags`. Peter
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > The packages are not in backports yet and have to go through the > backports NEW queue [1]. If I am not mistaken, the same rules as for > the regular NEW queue apply, such that the initial upload has to be > done by a DD. I had sponsorships of the initial upload for other > packages before (cgit, twinkle) for which I have DM upload rights. The backports documentation confirms that DMs require sponsorship: https://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index3h3 Peter
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
Hi Tim, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:56:45AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the > backport ACL > already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that > package. Feel free to > upload it yourself to backports without having to go through anyone else. > > I don't think that any special sponsorship should be required in this case, > especially if you are > already an uploader (and primary author) for the package. The packages are not in backports yet and have to go through the backports NEW queue [1]. If I am not mistaken, the same rules as for the regular NEW queue apply, such that the initial upload has to be done by a DD. I had sponsorships of the initial upload for other packages before (cgit, twinkle) for which I have DM upload rights. [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html Peter
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
On 20 Oct 2016, at 5:08 PM, Gianfranco Costamagnawrote: > > Hi Tim, > > >> I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the >> backport ACL > >> already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that >> package. Feel free to >> upload it yourself to backports without having to go through anyone else. >> >> I don't think that any special sponsorship should be required in this case, >> especially if you are >> already an uploader (and primary author) for the package. > > > it is required to have a first upload signed by a DD key, because it has to > go in backports-new queue. > > Do you still plan to upload such golang packages? > (talking about #841375 #841382 #841381 #841380 #841379 #841378 #841377 > #841376) Ah OK. That makes sense. I will do those uploads to kick things off. Regards, Tim. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
Hi Tim, >I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the >backport ACL >already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that package. > Feel free to >upload it yourself to backports without having to go through anyone else. > >I don't think that any special sponsorship should be required in this case, >especially if you are >already an uploader (and primary author) for the package. it is required to have a first upload signed by a DD key, because it has to go in backports-new queue. Do you still plan to upload such golang packages? (talking about #841375 #841382 #841381 #841380 #841379 #841378 #841377 #841376) thanks, Gianfranco
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
On 20 Oct 2016, at 2:33 PM, Peter Colbergwrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:25:12AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) > wrote: >> Hi Peter. I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to >> jessie-backports >> for you. I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type >> am happy to >> bundle them up with mine. > > That would be great! I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the backport ACL already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that package. Feel free to upload it yourself to backports without having to go through anyone else. I don't think that any special sponsorship should be required in this case, especially if you are already an uploader (and primary author) for the package. Tim. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
Hi Peter. > On 20 Oct 2016, at 1:15 PM, Peter Colbergwrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of the package > "golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1" to jessie-backports. The package > is a prerequisite for acmetool, a client for Let’s Encrypt. I have > been added to the backports ACL for subsequent maintenance. > > gbp clone --debian-branch=debian/jessie-backports > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1.git Hi Peter. I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to jessie-backports for you. I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type am happy to bundle them up with mine. Tim. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1
Hi Tim, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:25:12AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi Peter. I can sponsor the uploads for this and the other packages to > jessie-backports > for you. I'm in the middle of doing a large batch of uploads of this type am > happy to > bundle them up with mine. That would be great! Peter