Bug#846029: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#846029: Bug#846029: Bug#846029: request-tracker4: uses deprecated gpg1
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 12:58:21PM +1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > Hey, > > On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 11:03 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:47:30PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > > > Maybe its time to switch RT4 to gnupg2? > > > > Andrew: I think that this just means replicating the changes you made > > in RT5 to drop the gpg1 patches and update the dependency? Do you > > foresee > > any issues with this? > > The changes I made for our RT5 packaging are already in the RT4 branch. > I think we should be safe to switch RT to using gnupg2. This will > probably require a note in debian/NEWS as people may need to update how > they handle gpg passphrases. > > The only dependency change we need to make is Build-Depends. I had a quick look but it looks like there are quite a few gpg1 patches in the RT4 branch still. Do you have unpushed changes? I did the naive thing and dropped the gpg1 patches and switched the build-depends to gnupg, but that results in lots of test failures. Cheers Dominic
Bug#846029: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#846029: Bug#846029: request-tracker4: uses deprecated gpg1
Hey, On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 11:03 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:47:30PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > Maybe its time to switch RT4 to gnupg2? > > Andrew: I think that this just means replicating the changes you made > in RT5 to drop the gpg1 patches and update the dependency? Do you > foresee > any issues with this? The changes I made for our RT5 packaging are already in the RT4 branch. I think we should be safe to switch RT to using gnupg2. This will probably require a note in debian/NEWS as people may need to update how they handle gpg passphrases. The only dependency change we need to make is Build-Depends. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand and...@etc.gen.nz| linux.conf.au 2020, Gold Coast, AU https://catalystcloud.nz | https://lca2020.linux.org.au
Bug#846029: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#846029: request-tracker4: uses deprecated gpg1
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:47:30PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi, > > * Dominic Hargreaves [201215 21:46]: > > Since #845534 was fixed RT now uses gpg1, which is deprecated, or at > > least its uses discouraged, in Debian. > > As of today, RT4 is apparently the last package directly depending > on gnupg1 in bullseye. The other packages doing so appear to be > using gpg1 only for tests at build time. Thanks for raising this. I imagine it's better for everyone if gnupg1 doesn't get shipped in bullseye. Let's try to make this happen. > > Fixing this is blocked by #845781. > > This appears to be fixed. > > Maybe its time to switch RT4 to gnupg2? Andrew: I think that this just means replicating the changes you made in RT5 to drop the gpg1 patches and update the dependency? Do you foresee any issues with this? Cheers Dominic
Bug#846029: request-tracker4: uses deprecated gpg1
Hi, * Dominic Hargreaves [201215 21:46]: > Since #845534 was fixed RT now uses gpg1, which is deprecated, or at > least its uses discouraged, in Debian. As of today, RT4 is apparently the last package directly depending on gnupg1 in bullseye. The other packages doing so appear to be using gpg1 only for tests at build time. > Fixing this is blocked by #845781. This appears to be fixed. Maybe its time to switch RT4 to gnupg2? Best, Chris
Bug#846029: request-tracker4: uses deprecated gpg1
Source: request-tracker4 Version: 4.2.13-4 Severity: normal Since #845534 was fixed RT now uses gpg1, which is deprecated, or at least its uses discouraged, in Debian. Fixing this is blocked by #845781. Dominic.
