Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3
Christopher Hoskin: > I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought > I might as well upload it. Hope you don't mind! Not at all :) Just remember that retitling a RFP bug into an ITP and taking ownership makes it easier to see that somebody is already working on the package. Thanks! Alex signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:03:07PM +, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought I might as > well upload it. Hope you don't mind! > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libamazon-s3-perl.git Awesome. Thank you both!
Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3
I'd already done most of this at the weekend, so thought I might as well upload it. Hope you don't mind! https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libamazon-s3-perl.git Christopher
Bug#847514: Amazon::S3 vs. Net::Amazon::S3
Reading the CPAN Ratings I found out that Net::Amazon::S3 has many more dependencies (some huge ones, like Moose and XML::LibXML) than Amazon::S3. In my opinion, that difference should justify that we also package Amazon::S3 for Debian since RT depends on it. On the other side, https://github.com/tima/perl-amazon-s3 hasn't received any changes since 2009 and the CPAN RT queue for Amazon::S3 has been unattended for several years too. So it seems that Amazon::S3 is actually unmaintained. FWIW, https://github.com/rustyconover/net-amazon-s3 hasn't got any changes in more than a year either (9 issues and 3 pull requests open). I may be wrong, but I think that, in terms of maintainership, there's no difference between the two at this moment. Thus, unless there's any strong opinion against it, I'll start packaging Amazon::S3 in a few days so we can have all RT 4.4 deps ready. Cheers! Alex signature.asc Description: Digital signature
