Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 17:06:50 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞായര് 11 ഡിസംബര് 2016 04:59 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Like my previous reply. Won't FTBFS be considered as affecting the > > package, then it needs to be documented. > > The announcement said "Should your upload to unstable include security fixes > or fixes for severe bugs, we file an unblock bug asking for us to lower the > required age." I was under the impression that all RC bugs qualify. It would > have been better if it said (severity grave or critical then there wouldn't > have been any confusion). > > As far as testing is concerned, that upload doesn't fix a RC bug there, since the package, and thus the bug, is not in testing. Cheers, Julien
Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr
# bcc to control@ user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 847636 + unblock tags 847636 + moreinfo On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 10:45 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: release-debian.org Please either use reportbug or add the correct metadata yourself (and preferably use package names that exist :-p). > Fixes serious bug #846010 and #847614 We're not frozen yet, so what you're asking for is for the upload to migrate to testing more quickly than the default 10 days. There is no node-cpr package in testing currently and, even if there were, neither of the cited bugs would affect the usability of the package there, so I'm not personally convinced that they merit a reduction in migration time. Regards, Adam
Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr
On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 10 10:47:01 PM IST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: ># bcc to control@ >user release.debian@packages.debian.org >usertags 847636 + unblock >tags 847636 + moreinfo > >On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 10:45 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> package: release-debian.org > >Please either use reportbug or add the correct metadata yourself (and >preferably use package names that exist :-p). > >> Fixes serious bug #846010 and #847614 > >We're not frozen yet, so what you're asking for is for the upload to >migrate to testing more quickly than the default 10 days. > >There is no node-cpr package in testing currently and, even if there >were, neither of the cited bugs would affect the usability of the >package there, so I'm not personally convinced that they merit a >reduction in migration time. Like my previous reply. Won't FTBFS be considered as affecting the package, then it needs to be documented. >Regards, > >Adam
Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr
On ഞായര് 11 ഡിസംബര് 2016 04:59 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Like my previous reply. Won't FTBFS be considered as affecting the > package, then it needs to be documented. The announcement said "Should your upload to unstable include security fixes or fixes for severe bugs, we file an unblock bug asking for us to lower the required age." I was under the impression that all RC bugs qualify. It would have been better if it said (severity grave or critical then there wouldn't have been any confusion). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature