Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2018-08-04 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream

The current beta 1.0.0-beta1 has a new and free drumkit included
(GMRockKit instead of Gkit).


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2017-05-10 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2017-05-11 0:28 GMT+02:00 Roberto :

> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:09:35PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2017-03-22 8:14 GMT+01:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> > > Thank you for reporting this issue.
> > > Actually it is quite unfortunate ... If we would remove GMkit we would
> > > loose tutorial demo songs.
> > > Is there any alternative for GMkit around with friendly license
> > > which we could recommend to upstream author as replacement for GMkit?
> > >
> >
> > Just for record ...
> > I have been discussing this issue with upstream developers ... GMkit
> should
> > be replaced
> > by something with friendly license. Hopefully in next release.
>
>
Hi Roberto,

I will try to help by recording a few new original samples, can you
> please point me to the correct upstream contact or mailing list?
>

If can record some original samples it can be really helpful ;)
Upstream contacts I am using ...
mau...@smoors.de co...@users.sourceforge.net

best regards

mira


Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2017-05-10 Thread Roberto
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:09:35PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2017-03-22 8:14 GMT+01:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> > Thank you for reporting this issue.
> > Actually it is quite unfortunate ... If we would remove GMkit we would
> > loose tutorial demo songs.
> > Is there any alternative for GMkit around with friendly license
> > which we could recommend to upstream author as replacement for GMkit?
> >
> 
> Just for record ...
> I have been discussing this issue with upstream developers ... GMkit should
> be replaced
> by something with friendly license. Hopefully in next release.
> 
> mira


Sorry for delay in my reply. Good to know that it is already being
addressed.

I don't know of any replacement, unfortunately. I would also be
interested in them, I was looking for free GM drums for the FreePats 2.0
sound bank, and I can assert that it is quite difficult to find anything
actually created from original content. Some of them carry a free
license, but when closely inspected their content is in the same
situation than this one, or worse :/

I will try to help by recording a few new original samples, can you
please point me to the correct upstream contact or mailing list?



Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2017-04-08 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2017-03-22 8:14 GMT+01:00 Jaromír Mikeš :

>
>
> 2017-03-20 19:03 GMT+01:00 Roberto :
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Package: hydrogen
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Content under directory data/drumkits/GMkit is derived from non-free
>> sources (seems to be taken from Roland XV-5080 internal sound libraries).
>> The file data/drumkits/GMkit/drumkit.xml only says "undefined license".
>>
>> Manufacturers of hardware synthesizers sometimes don't say which license
>> applies to their bundled sample libraries, but they are certainly not in
>> the public domain. They typically allow commercial content created with
>> them, without paying royalties, but they could complain if someone creates
>> a competing product derived from their sounds. A software synthesizer can
>> be seen as a competing product (there are precedents of this by Roland
>> Corporation in particular).
>>
>> Moreover, please consider documenting all files under "data" directory in
>> debian/copyright, it will make easier to spot this issues, I've been using
>> the Roland samples in this package for years without knowing.
>>
>
> Thank you for reporting this issue.
> Actually it is quite unfortunate ... If we would remove GMkit we would
> loose tutorial demo songs.
> Is there any alternative for GMkit around with friendly license
> which we could recommend to upstream author as replacement for GMkit?
>

Just for record ...
I have been discussing this issue with upstream developers ... GMkit should
be replaced
by something with friendly license. Hopefully in next release.

mira


Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2017-03-22 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2017-03-20 19:03 GMT+01:00 Roberto :

Hi Roberto,

Package: hydrogen
> Severity: normal
>
> Content under directory data/drumkits/GMkit is derived from non-free
> sources (seems to be taken from Roland XV-5080 internal sound libraries).
> The file data/drumkits/GMkit/drumkit.xml only says "undefined license".
>
> Manufacturers of hardware synthesizers sometimes don't say which license
> applies to their bundled sample libraries, but they are certainly not in
> the public domain. They typically allow commercial content created with
> them, without paying royalties, but they could complain if someone creates
> a competing product derived from their sounds. A software synthesizer can
> be seen as a competing product (there are precedents of this by Roland
> Corporation in particular).
>
> Moreover, please consider documenting all files under "data" directory in
> debian/copyright, it will make easier to spot this issues, I've been using
> the Roland samples in this package for years without knowing.
>

Thank you for reporting this issue.
Actually it is quite unfortunate ... If we would remove GMkit we would
loose tutorial demo songs.
Is there any alternative for GMkit around with friendly license
which we could recommend to upstream author as replacement for GMkit?

best regards

mira


Bug#858281: hydrogen: Please remove GMkit content from the package due to license

2017-03-20 Thread Roberto
Package: hydrogen
Severity: normal

Content under directory data/drumkits/GMkit is derived from non-free
sources (seems to be taken from Roland XV-5080 internal sound libraries).
The file data/drumkits/GMkit/drumkit.xml only says "undefined license".

Manufacturers of hardware synthesizers sometimes don't say which license
applies to their bundled sample libraries, but they are certainly not in
the public domain. They typically allow commercial content created with
them, without paying royalties, but they could complain if someone creates
a competing product derived from their sounds. A software synthesizer can
be seen as a competing product (there are precedents of this by Roland
Corporation in particular).

Moreover, please consider documenting all files under "data" directory in
debian/copyright, it will make easier to spot this issues, I've been using
the Roland samples in this package for years without knowing.