Bug#859719: sslscan: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

[Marvin Stark]

Hi Sebastian,

I'll orphan the package and I think it should be removed.

See bug=905862.

Feel free to adopt the package :)


On 06/14/2018 11:36 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Marvin, do you have any plans here? Upstream made it clear that they
> won't support openssl 1.1.0+ and I doubt that an embedded copy of the
> ssl library will work here (not saying it won't, it is not my
> decision).
>
> Sebastian
>

-- 
 .""`. Marvin Stark 
: :"  :Homepage: www.der-marv.de
`. `"`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#859719: sslscan: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Marvin, do you have any plans here? Upstream made it clear that they
won't support openssl 1.1.0+ and I doubt that an embedded copy of the
ssl library will work here (not saying it won't, it is not my
decision).

Sebastian

Bug#859719: sslscan: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Hi,

this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55

Sebastian

Bug#859719: sslscan: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

Package: sslscan
Version: 1.11.5-rbsec-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: sid buster
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: openssl-1.1-trans

Please migrate to libssl-dev in the Buster cycle. The bug report about
the FTBFS is #828556. The log of the FTBFS can be found at

https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/sslscan_1.11.5-rbsec-1_amd64-20160529-1539

The issue was closed upstream with "no can't do"
https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/issues/108

Sebastian