Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Done waiting from your side > > On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >>> wrote: Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick Control: severity -1 normal On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the > ABI. > Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... > > Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ > > I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and > it > was fine. > > I will fix ASAP the problems. What problems? FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental >>> >>> Smell like a compiler bug :S >> >> Fixed, could you please go for transition. Due to huge backlog of >> security problem the sooener the better > > Go ahead. > > Emilio
Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien > wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >>> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick >>> Control: severity -1 normal >>> >>> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hi, I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the ABI. Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it was fine. I will fix ASAP the problems. >>> >>> What problems? >>> >>> FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: >>> >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental >> >> Smell like a compiler bug :S > > Fixed, could you please go for transition. Due to huge backlog of > security problem the sooener the better Go ahead. Emilio
Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick >> Control: severity -1 normal >> >> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: important >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the >>> ABI. >>> Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... >>> >>> Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ >>> >>> I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it >>> was fine. >>> >>> I will fix ASAP the problems. >> >> What problems? >> >> FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental > > Smell like a compiler bug :S Fixed, could you please go for transition. Due to huge backlog of security problem the sooener the better
Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick > Control: severity -1 normal > > On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the >> ABI. >> Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... >> >> Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ >> >> I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it >> was fine. >> >> I will fix ASAP the problems. > > What problems? > > FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental Smell like a compiler bug :S > >> I have set the severity to important because I will prefer to get quickly a >> newer imagemagick version due to the number of security bug to backport > > Don't do that, and please use reportbug to get the necessary usertags. > > Cheers, > Emilio
Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick Control: severity -1 normal On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the > ABI. > Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... > > Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ > > I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it > was fine. > > I will fix ASAP the problems. What problems? FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental > I have set the severity to important because I will prefer to get quickly a > newer imagemagick version due to the number of security bug to backport Don't do that, and please use reportbug to get the necessary usertags. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hi, I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the ABI. Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable... Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++ I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it was fine. I will fix ASAP the problems. I have set the severity to important because I will prefer to get quickly a newer imagemagick version due to the number of security bug to backport Thanks for your work Bastien signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
