Bug#876238: gcc-cross-support: FTBFS, wants to regenerate debian/control with more and renamed packages

2017-09-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 20.09.2017 06:16, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> So while there hasn't been any upload, progress is not stuck. I'd like
> to keep the package (rc buggy as it is) in experimental for a while
> though. I hope that doesn't cause too much pain to you.

No problem. Now it's documented that this package still has a purpose.
(I just did a rebuild of experimental and I'm slowly processing the
failures. There is some quite old cruft that no longer builds... That is
at least getting RC bugs now.)


Andreas



Bug#876238: gcc-cross-support: FTBFS, wants to regenerate debian/control with more and renamed packages

2017-09-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Andreas,

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:37:38AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> gcc-cross-support FTBFS in experimental, tries to regenerate
> debian/control in order to rename several packages and add a bunch of
> new ones.

Yes. The problem essentially is that you can only upload
gcc-cross-support after a stable update of dpkg, because either it FTBFS
or dak rejects it, because dak's idea of valid architectures differs
from dpkg's.

> Given that the package hasn't seen any upload in the last two years,
> maybe it's not needed for the current cross compilers and should rather
> be removed than fixed :-)

Indeed the goal is to get it removed. Removing the package that is, not
removing the functionality. We have made significant progress by
introducing binutils-for-host and binutils-for build into src:binutils
now. The next step is introducing gcc-7-for-host and when gcc-defaults
takes over gcc-for-host, I want to remove the source package. Until
then, I'd like to keep it accessible to show where this work is heading.

So while there hasn't been any upload, progress is not stuck. I'd like
to keep the package (rc buggy as it is) in experimental for a while
though. I hope that doesn't cause too much pain to you.

Helmut



Bug#876238: gcc-cross-support: FTBFS, wants to regenerate debian/control with more and renamed packages

2017-09-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: gcc-cross-support
Version: 3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hi,

gcc-cross-support FTBFS in experimental, tries to regenerate
debian/control in order to rename several packages and add a bunch of
new ones.

Given that the package hasn't seen any upload in the last two years,
maybe it's not needed for the current cross compilers and should rather
be removed than fixed :-)

Build log is attached.


Andreas


gcc-cross-support_3.log.gz
Description: application/gzip