Bug#880347: bug squashing target: Probably bowtie 1.2.1.1 issue (Was: Bug#880347: bioperl-run: FTBFS: Test failures)

2017-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alex,

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 06:12:05PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> 
> That's a trivial one, s/reads processed: 1000/reads processed: 2000/
> I'll take care.

Cool!  Thanks a lot.

BTW, there are *lots* if easy ones - just in case this will keep
motivation of all team members higher. ;-)

Kind regards

 Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#880347: bug squashing target: Probably bowtie 1.2.1.1 issue (Was: Bug#880347: bioperl-run: FTBFS: Test failures)

2017-12-07 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
> ...
> #   Failed test 'bowtie success'
> #   at t/Bowtie.t line 188.
> #   '# reads processed: 2000
> # # reads with at least one reported alignment: 2000 (100.00%)
> # # reads that failed to align: 0 (0.00%)
> # Reported 1000 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)
> # '
> # doesn't match '(?^:reads processed: 1000)'
> 
> #   Failed test 'bowtie success'
> #   at t/Bowtie.t line 195.
> #   '# reads processed: 2000
> # # reads with at least one reported alignment: 2000 (100.00%)
> # # reads that failed to align: 0 (0.00%)
> # Reported 1000 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)
> # '
> # doesn't match '(?^:reads processed: 1000)'
> # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 61.
> t/Bowtie.t .
> ...
> 
> 
> I suspect that some change between bowtie 1.2.0 and bowtie 1.2.1.1 is
> responsible for the issue in bioperl-run.  I wonder whether tracking
> down this issue sounds interesting for somebody who knows (and uses)
> bowtie a bit.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>Andreas.
> 


Hi Andreas,

That's a trivial one, s/reads processed: 1000/reads processed: 2000/
I'll take care.

Best regards,
Alex



Bug#880347: bug squashing target: Probably bowtie 1.2.1.1 issue (Was: Bug#880347: bioperl-run: FTBFS: Test failures)

2017-12-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

this bug report has a time correlation to the upload of the new version of
bowtie (1.2.1.1):

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:08:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: bioperl-run
> Version: 1.7.2-1
> Severity: serious
> ...
> 
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > ok 9 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> > present
> > ok 10 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> > present
> > ok 11 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> > present
> > ok 12 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> > present
> > ok
> > 
> > Test Summary Report
> > ---
> > t/Bowtie.t  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 61 Failed: 2)
> >   Failed tests:  43, 45
> >   Non-zero exit status: 2
> > Files=72, Tests=1690, 156 wallclock secs ( 0.24 usr  0.07 sys + 133.72 cusr 
> >  6.41 csys = 140.44 CPU)
> > Result: FAIL
> > Failed 1/72 test programs. 2/1690 subtests failed.
> > dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
> > debian/rules:32: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed

Earlier in the log:


...
#   Failed test 'bowtie success'
#   at t/Bowtie.t line 188.
#   '# reads processed: 2000
# # reads with at least one reported alignment: 2000 (100.00%)
# # reads that failed to align: 0 (0.00%)
# Reported 1000 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:reads processed: 1000)'

#   Failed test 'bowtie success'
#   at t/Bowtie.t line 195.
#   '# reads processed: 2000
# # reads with at least one reported alignment: 2000 (100.00%)
# # reads that failed to align: 0 (0.00%)
# Reported 1000 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s)
# '
# doesn't match '(?^:reads processed: 1000)'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 61.
t/Bowtie.t .
...


I suspect that some change between bowtie 1.2.0 and bowtie 1.2.1.1 is
responsible for the issue in bioperl-run.  I wonder whether tracking
down this issue sounds interesting for somebody who knows (and uses)
bowtie a bit.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#880347: bioperl-run: FTBFS: Test failures

2017-10-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: bioperl-run
Version: 1.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20171030 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> ok 9 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not present
> ok 10 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> present
> ok 11 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> present
> ok 12 # skip Required executable for Bio::Tools::Run::tRNAscanSE is not 
> present
> ok
> 
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/Bowtie.t  (Wstat: 512 Tests: 61 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  43, 45
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
> Files=72, Tests=1690, 156 wallclock secs ( 0.24 usr  0.07 sys + 133.72 cusr  
> 6.41 csys = 140.44 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Failed 1/72 test programs. 2/1690 subtests failed.
> dh_auto_test: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
> debian/rules:32: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/10/30/bioperl-run_1.7.2-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.