Bug#884043: Bug #884043: obfsproxy: Ship an AppArmor profile again

[intrigeri]

Hi,

Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> PS: Both bugs are now closed (weasel@ handled it in tor, and I did an NMU
> to ooniprobe);

Great, thanks!

So, given:

>  fteproxy is now the only package depending on obfsproxy.

… and:

> - fteproxy hard-depends on obfsproxy, but uses it as a library so
>   AppArmor confinement doesn't matter there.

… I think leaving this bug open and wontfix for a little while is
a suitable approach. If someone on the team prefers to close it,
I don't mind.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

Bug#884043: Bug #884043: obfsproxy: Ship an AppArmor profile again

[Nicolas Braud-Santoni]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 08:48:06AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi pkg-privacy-tools & fteproxy maintainers!
> > 
> > Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> > > - tor and ooniprobe suggest obfsproxy, and that should be dropped;
> > >   ooniprobe should suggest obfs4proxy instead.
> > 
> > [...]
> > Nicolas, do you want to file bugs recommending these two changes?
> 
> Done (#884369 and #884370)

PS: Both bugs are now closed (weasel@ handled it in tor, and I did an NMU
to ooniprobe); fteproxy is now the only package depending on obfsproxy.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature