Bug#884253: GPXsee package

[Martin Tůma]

"upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue" ??!
What the hell are you talking about?! The licensing of GPXSee is fully 
transparent which
have been confirmed by the OpenSUSE and Fedora licensing teams that had no
objections when adding GPXSee to their distributions (the licenses are since 
then
checked with every version update).

Today, almost every major distribution (as well as FreeBSD) with exception of 
Debian
and its derivates includes GPXSee and not a single one of them had any problems
with licensing. So please STOP spreading this FUD of "serious licensing issue"!

Martin Tůma

__
> Od: JCF Ploemen <li...@jcf.pm>
> Komu: Tino Mettler <tino+deb...@tikei.de>
> Datum: 28.05.2018 15:32
> Předmět: Bug#884253: GPXsee package
>
> CC: <884...@bugs.debian.org, 884253-submit...@bugs.debian.org>
>On Fri, 18 May 2018 11:04:51 +0200
>Tino Mettler <tino+deb...@tikei.de> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see a GPXsee package in Debian, too. Is there any progress
>> or a preliminary package that I could test?
>
>I have a fully working packaging, but for now cannot proceed due to
>upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue.
>Investigating a possible last resort workaround is on my todo list but
>not very high priority given the circumstances.
>
>

Bug#884253: GPXsee package

[JCF Ploemen]

On Fri, 18 May 2018 11:04:51 +0200
Tino Mettler  wrote:

> I'd like to see a GPXsee package in Debian, too. Is there any progress
> or a preliminary package that I could test?

I have a fully working packaging, but for now cannot proceed due to
upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue.
Investigating a possible last resort workaround is on my todo list but
not very high priority given the circumstances.


pgp7fgVsOrZ1l.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#884253: GPXsee package

[Tino Mettler]

Hi,

I'd like to see a GPXsee package in Debian, too. Is there any progress
or a preliminary package that I could test?

Regards,
Tino