Bug#884850: librsvg: FTBFS on (32-bit && !any-i386): masking-mask-01-b.svg: 661 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 2) from reference image

2018-08-30 Thread Simon McVittie
Version: 2.44.1-1

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 at 12:31:47 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > # Storing test result image at /tmp/masking-mask-01-b-out.png
> > # 661 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 2) from reference image
> >
> > # Storing test result image at /tmp/masking-mask-01-b-diff.png
> > not ok 16 /rsvg/reftest/svg1.1/masking-mask-01-b.svg
> > FAIL: rsvg-test 16 /rsvg/reftest/svg1.1/masking-mask-01-b.svg

This seems to be fixed in experimental.

smcv



Bug#884850: librsvg: FTBFS on (32-bit && !any-i386): masking-mask-01-b.svg: 661 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 2) from reference image

2017-12-20 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: librsvg
Version: 2.40.20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

librsvg fails the same test in the same way on all the 32-bit
architectures, except for (hurd-)i386 which have a different test
failure, m68k and powerpcspe which (IMO unwisely) build with nocheck,
and kfreebsd-i386 which hasn't been attempted yet. This seems too
well-correlated to be coincidence.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=armel=2.40.20-1=1513733747=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=armhf=2.40.20-1=1513733897=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=mips=2.40.20-1=1513733801=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=mipsel=2.40.20-1=1513734074=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=hppa=2.40.20-1=1513745188=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=powerpc=2.40.20-1=1513733546=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg=x32=2.40.20-1=1513734144=0
> # Storing test result image at /tmp/masking-mask-01-b-out.png
> # 661 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 2) from reference image
>
> # Storing test result image at /tmp/masking-mask-01-b-diff.png
> not ok 16 /rsvg/reftest/svg1.1/masking-mask-01-b.svg
> FAIL: rsvg-test 16 /rsvg/reftest/svg1.1/masking-mask-01-b.svg

i386 and hurd-i386 had a different test failure for which I've opened a
separate bug (wild guess: maybe it's to do with excess precision in the
387-compatible FPU, which is an i386 quirk).

Regards,
smcv