Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise 
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 13:24 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:

> I don't feel I can patch yarn myself to use execFile rather than
> exec: this is a change that upstream should implement.

I was asking if you could write a patch and send it to upstream for
inclusion upstream, not keep it in Debian.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paolo Greppi 
Il 07/04/2018 11:23, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> 
>> The suggestion has been rejected
> 
> Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch:
> 
> https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352
> 
> I don't know JavaScript well enough, could you write the patch?

As I worte above, I don't feel I can patch yarn myself to use execFile rather 
than exec: this is a change that upstream should implement.

Paolo

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise 
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote:

> The suggestion has been rejected

Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch:

https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352

I don't know JavaScript well enough, could you write the patch?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paolo Greppi 
The suggestion has been rejected by the nodejs module that is using puka that 
I'm trying to package (yarn).

I'll now proceed with packaging puka.
I'll add a note to README.Debian in yarnpkg on this.

Paolo