Bug#889722: conflict with apparmor < 2.11.1-4?

[Harald Dunkel]

nope

Thank you anyway
Harri

Bug#889722: conflict with apparmor < 2.11.1-4?

[Mathias Gibbens]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

  Given the age of this bug, I think it's become a moot point. Any
objections to closing it?

Mathias


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#889722: conflict with apparmor < 2.11.1-4?

[intrigeri]

Hi,

(just spotted this while looking for "apparmor" in src:lxc's list of bugs)

Harald Dunkel:
> Since apparmor 2.11.1-4 provides some necessary fixes for
> apparmor support, shouldn't lxc conflict with older versions?

> Important for backports, for example.

Good question! The class of problems fixed in 2.11.1-4 have also been
fixed in a Stretch p-u a while ago, so I *think* that a backport of
lxc to Stretch should not be affected. I did not test this though.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

Bug#889722: conflict with apparmor < 2.11.1-4?

[Harald Dunkel]

Package: lxc
Version: 1:2.0.9-6

Since apparmor 2.11.1-4 provides some necessary fixes for
apparmor support, shouldn't lxc conflict with older versions?

Important for backports, for example.


Regards
Harri