Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
control: close -1 On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 03:53:02PM +0200, François Mazen wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > the file msys/mingw-bundledlls.py was committed by mistake. It is only > needed to generate the Windows package. > I've removed it in the upstream code and I generated a new release > (1.4.3). I've also updated the copyright file for the new 1.4.3-1 > package. > > The new package is tagged debian/1.4.3-1 in the packaging repository: > > https://git.tuxfamily.org/taptempo/taptempo_deb_packaging.git/tag/?h=debian/1.4.3-1 > > and it's uploaded to mentors (just to check that everything is still > fine). Thanks. And uploaded.
Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 9:53 PM, François Mazen wrote: > the file msys/mingw-bundledlls.py was committed by mistake. It is only > needed to generate the Windows package. > I've removed it in the upstream code and I generated a new release > (1.4.3). I've also updated the copyright file for the new 1.4.3-1 > package. Please re-add it in the next version, people using Windows deserve to be able to automatically rebuild Windows packages from modified versions of the code. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
Hi Lumin, the file msys/mingw-bundledlls.py was committed by mistake. It is only needed to generate the Windows package. I've removed it in the upstream code and I generated a new release (1.4.3). I've also updated the copyright file for the new 1.4.3-1 package. The new package is tagged debian/1.4.3-1 in the packaging repository: https://git.tuxfamily.org/taptempo/taptempo_deb_packaging.git/tag/?h=debian/1.4.3-1 and it's uploaded to mentors (just to check that everything is still fine). Best Regards, François Le vendredi 14 septembre 2018 à 03:09 +, Mo Zhou a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:57:42PM +0200, François Mazen wrote: > > Hi Lumin, > > > > congratulation for your promotion as Debian Developer! > > > > I downgraded the standard version of my package from 4.2.1 to 4.1.4 > > and > > I uploaded it to mentors but Lintian has been updated in the > > meantime. > > So I've kept the 4.2.1 version and you can upload: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/taptempo > > Oops, I have no idea when msys/mingw-bundledlls.py appeared in > the source package but you have to add it to the copyright file. > > The rest looks good to me. Please tag debian/1.4.2-1 in your > packaging > repository after fixing the copyright. I'll directly upload the > package from your git repo instead of mentors. (So you don't have to > upload to mentors again)
Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:57:42PM +0200, François Mazen wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > congratulation for your promotion as Debian Developer! > > I downgraded the standard version of my package from 4.2.1 to 4.1.4 and > I uploaded it to mentors but Lintian has been updated in the meantime. > So I've kept the 4.2.1 version and you can upload: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/taptempo Oops, I have no idea when msys/mingw-bundledlls.py appeared in the source package but you have to add it to the copyright file. The rest looks good to me. Please tag debian/1.4.2-1 in your packaging repository after fixing the copyright. I'll directly upload the package from your git repo instead of mentors. (So you don't have to upload to mentors again)
Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
Hi Lumin, congratulation for your promotion as Debian Developer! I downgraded the standard version of my package from 4.2.1 to 4.1.4 and I uploaded it to mentors but Lintian has been updated in the meantime. So I've kept the 4.2.1 version and you can upload: https://mentors.debian.net/package/taptempo Thanks a lot for the sponsoring! Best Regards, François Le jeudi 13 septembre 2018 à 11:59 +, Mo Zhou a écrit : > control: owner -1 ! > > Hi François, > > I can sponsor this package for you now. Would you mind updating the > package and bump the standard version? Or should I upload it as is? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#893377: Re: Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]
control: owner -1 ! Hi François, I can sponsor this package for you now. Would you mind updating the package and bump the standard version? Or should I upload it as is?
