Bug#897165: transition: botan
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:41 PM László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed [...] > > Please go ahead. >Uploaded and already built on most architectures. You started the binNMUs and all dependent packages are built on all of our primary architectures. The transition is finished, botan can migrate to testing in some days. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS
Bug#897165: transition: botan
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:14 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > On 29/04/18 12:43, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent > > packages are only biboumi and qtcreator. Both build fine with it. > > > > Two things to note. For sixteen days it's still doesn't scheduled to > > build on armhf, but I don't think it would have any problem. Then it > > failed to build on armel due to an unrelated problem. I've already > > requested a give-back just in case. > That should have been due to #895738, which is already fixed. Indeed, I should have noted it is known and fixed. > Please go ahead. Uploaded and already built on most architectures. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS
Bug#897165: transition: botan
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 29/04/18 12:43, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent > packages are only biboumi and qtcreator. Both build fine with it. > > Two things to note. For sixteen days it's still doesn't scheduled to > build on armhf, but I don't think it would have any problem. Then it > failed to build on armel due to an unrelated problem. I've already > requested a give-back just in case. That should have been due to #895738, which is already fixed. Please go ahead. Emilio
Bug#897165: transition: botan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, A small, incremental transition of botan 2.4 -> 2.6 as the dependent packages are only biboumi and qtcreator. Both build fine with it. Two things to note. For sixteen days it's still doesn't scheduled to build on armhf, but I don't think it would have any problem. Then it failed to build on armel due to an unrelated problem. I've already requested a give-back just in case. Regards, Laszlo/GCS
