Bug#906765: libxsmm: baseline violation on amd64 and FTBFS everywhere else

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:26:03PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: libxsmm
> Version: 1.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs patch
> 
> libxsmm builds with -msse4.2 on amd64 and FTBFS everywhere else:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libxsmm=sid
> 
> Fix for the baseline violation:
> 
> --- debian/rules.old  2018-08-19 15:06:38.277886761 +
> +++ debian/rules  2018-08-19 15:08:40.141885599 +
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>  
>  export PREFIX=/usr
>  
> +export TARGET=-""
> +
>  %:
>   dh $@
>  
> 
> 
> The FTBFS problems on !amd64 don't seem easily fixable,
> and it is unclear whether this would be worth the effort.
> If fixing is not easily possible, an option would be
>   Architecture: any-amd64

There was no followup to this since almost two years or any of the other bugs,
should libxsmm be removed?

Cheers,
Moritz

Bug#906765: libxsmm: baseline violation on amd64 and FTBFS everywhere else

[Adrian Bunk]

Source: libxsmm
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch

libxsmm builds with -msse4.2 on amd64 and FTBFS everywhere else:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libxsmm=sid

Fix for the baseline violation:

--- debian/rules.old2018-08-19 15:06:38.277886761 +
+++ debian/rules2018-08-19 15:08:40.141885599 +
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 
 export PREFIX=/usr
 
+export TARGET=-""
+
 %:
dh $@
 


The FTBFS problems on !amd64 don't seem easily fixable,
and it is unclear whether this would be worth the effort.
If fixing is not easily possible, an option would be
  Architecture: any-amd64