Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi, Le jeu. 2 juil. 2020 à 10:34, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > I'm not the maintainer, but it is currently in NEW with d/changelog > fixed. Yep, I fixed it with the help of James Cowgill (he maintains aom with the same patent license) and re-upload the new version in January (~ 2 weeks after the reject). > > > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > I've done that repeatedly without any progress. > I did not ping them about this package but if Sebastian already tried to do it without any success, I guess I will not have more luck. Since the version 0.7.0 (the last version in NEW queue), there is no longer any files with Alliance-for-Open-Media-Patent-License-1.0 in their header. This AOM-Patent-License-1.0 is only provided in doc/PATENTS, so maybe this will simplify the approval. Best, Dylan
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Sebastian! At the moment, kodi 18.7.1 is not blocked. Also, if there is no package the dav1d support is disabled in 19 either. However, I referred to the whole situation: the maintainers come to bring new packages and improve the existing ones, not waiting months & years without a feedback. FYI, kodi 19 benefits much from enabling dav1d on streams like Netflix, so I build Kodi for my testing repo with dav1d packaged. Same applies to shairplay & libudfread (I ITP'ed and packaged these under Mattia's mentorship and even persuaded the upstream lead developer Jean-Baptiste Kempf to make a new tag for libudfread after three years since the packaged tag was released) Jean-Baptiste expressed big wish to have dav1d and libudfread in Debian during our conversation related to udfread tagging, so I feel obliged to do everything I can to make it happen. -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:41:38 AM UTC, Sebastian Ramacher написав(-ла): >Hi Vasyl > >On 2020-07-02 08:20:11 +, Vasyl Gello wrote: >> Hi Jonas! >> >> I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. > >How is dav1d blocking kodi work? Once dav1d is in the archive in ffmpeg >is uploaded with dav1d support enabled, won't kodi also automatically >have dav1d support? If they kodi is using it directly, is there no >option to disable it until it is available? > >Cheers > >> Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for >> review? >> >> Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). >> At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source >> packages). >> >> I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the >> publuc unofficial repo >> (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS >> after Kodi reaches >> release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as >> development of Kodi upstream >> progresses. >> >> With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it >> gracefully, the whole project >> might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. >> -- >> Vasyl Gello >> == >> Certified SolidWorks Expert >> >> Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 >> >> E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com >> >> Skype: vasek.gello >> == >> 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 >> >> July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): >> >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >> >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello >> >> wrote: >> >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >> >> > Can you please package it? >> >> >> >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >> >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >> >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >> >> convert this ITP to RFP... >> > >> >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >> >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 >> > >> >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >> >more transparent. Much appreciated! >> > >> >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? >> > >> >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >> >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >> >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >> >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. >> > >> >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >> >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. >> > >> >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >> >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >> >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. >> > >> >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. >> > >> >Kind regards, >> > >> > - Jonas >> > >> >-- >> > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> > >> > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > > >-- >Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Vasyl On 2020-07-02 08:20:11 +, Vasyl Gello wrote: > Hi Jonas! > > I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. How is dav1d blocking kodi work? Once dav1d is in the archive in ffmpeg is uploaded with dav1d support enabled, won't kodi also automatically have dav1d support? If they kodi is using it directly, is there no option to disable it until it is available? Cheers > Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for > review? > > Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). > At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source > packages). > > I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the > publuc unofficial repo > (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS > after Kodi reaches > release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as > development of Kodi upstream > progresses. > > With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it > gracefully, the whole project > might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. > -- > Vasyl Gello > == > Certified SolidWorks Expert > > Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > > E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com > > Skype: vasek.gello > == > 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > > July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): > >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > >> wrote: > >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > >> > Can you please package it? > >> > >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > >> convert this ITP to RFP... > > > >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > > >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > >more transparent. Much appreciated! > > > >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > > >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > > >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > > >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > > > >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. > > > >Kind regards, > > > > - Jonas > > > >-- > > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
On 2020-07-02 10:11:03 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > > wrote: > > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > > Can you please package it? > > > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > > convert this ITP to RFP... > > I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > more transparent. Much appreciated! > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. I'm not the maintainer, but it is currently in NEW with d/changelog fixed. > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. I've done that repeatedly without any progress. > If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. It's already maintained in the team: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dav1d Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-02 10:11:03) > Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello > > wrote: > > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > > Can you please package it? > > > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > > convert this ITP to RFP... > > I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > > Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > more transparent. Much appreciated! > > Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > > If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > > When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > > If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > > If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. Ah, I see now that your original ITP mentioned maintaining it in the Multimedia team. So ignore my suggestion to move it there, but my other comments seem still valid. Also, you have the option of asking for help in the Multimedia team (I don't recall your doing that regarding this package - sorry if I am mistaken). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Dear colleagues, I am importing dav1d 0.7.1 in an hour. Please consider this FYI to avoid double work. -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:20:11 AM UTC, Vasyl Gello написав(-ла): >Hi Jonas! > >I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. >Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for >review? > >Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). >At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source >packages). > >I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the >publuc unofficial repo >(see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS >after Kodi reaches >release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as >development of Kodi upstream >progresses. > >With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it >gracefully, the whole project >might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. >-- >Vasyl Gello >== >Certified SolidWorks Expert > >Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > >E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com > >Skype: vasek.gello >== >호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > >July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): >>Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello >>> wrote: >>> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >>> > Can you please package it? >>> >>> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >>> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >>> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >>> convert this ITP to RFP... >> >>I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >>https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 >> >>Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >>more transparent. Much appreciated! >> >>Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? >> >>If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >>would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >>situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >>debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. >> >>When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >>irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. >> >>If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >>maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >>would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. >> >>If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. >> >>Kind regards, >> >> - Jonas >> >>-- >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> >> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Jonas! I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for review? Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source packages). I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the publuc unofficial repo (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS after Kodi reaches release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as development of Kodi upstream progresses. With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it gracefully, the whole project might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard написав(-ла): >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >> > Can you please package it? >> >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >> convert this ITP to RFP... > >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >more transparent. Much appreciated! > >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. > >Kind regards, > > - Jonas > >-- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: > > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > > Can you please package it? > > dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > convert this ITP to RFP... I guess the rejection is what you quoted in https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters more transparent. Much appreciated! Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi, (Please keep #916333 in CC ;-) Le jeu. 2 juil. 2020 à 09:44, Vasyl Gello a écrit : > So you have no objection against me doing a team upload and picking it for my > kodi work? > Jean-Batiste Kempf from VideoLAN also is very motivated to have dav1d in > Debian, so I will talk with Mattia & maybe even reach Joerg > on that matter. Feel free to do a team upload, but dav1d is still not in Debian and I don't know if it will be accepted one day... So, an upload now will have no real effect (at least for Debian). This situation is annoying because the reject was only about the AOM patent license but we already have the aom package in Debian with the same license. Best, Dylan
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Vasyl, On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 + Vasyl Gello wrote: > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > Can you please package it? dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably convert this ITP to RFP... Best, Dylan
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Hi Dylan! There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. Can you please package it? -- Vasyl Gello == Certified SolidWorks Expert Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello == 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
[Fabian Greffrath] > Well, it's in NEW for about a month now: > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dav1d_0.1.0-1.html Ah, cool. Hope it will get the required attention of the ftpmasters soon. > Erm, rav1e is an encoder whereas dav1d is a decoder, so hard to say > what's "better". Also, there is no dav1e, not that I knew of. Right, my confusion. I am looking for an encoder. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Hi, any news on getting this into Debian? Well, it's in NEW for about a month now: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dav1d_0.1.0-1.html > rav1e in Debian. Do you know if dav1e is better? Erm, rav1e is an encoder whereas dav1d is a decoder, so hard to say what's "better". Also, there is no dav1e, not that I knew of. Cheers, - Fabian
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
[Dylan Aïssi] > Description: fast and small AV1 video stream decoder > dav1d is an AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) cross-platform decoder and focused on speed > and correctness. Hi, any news on getting this into Debian? I gave it a go, but fail to get it to say anything except 'Failed to find demuxer for file'. Do you know where to find documentation on how to use it? What kind of input file will it accept? Feel free to poke me on #debian-multimedia if I can help. I created https://bugs.debian.org/920842 > yesterday to ask for rav1e in Debian. Do you know if dav1e is better? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder
Package: wnpp Owner: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Severity: wishlist Package name: dav1d Version: 0.1.0 Upstream Author: VideoLan URL: https://code.videolan.org/videolan/dav1d License: BSD-2-clause Description: fast and small AV1 video stream decoder dav1d is an AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) cross-platform decoder and focused on speed and correctness. . dav1d supports the following features: * support for all features of the AV1 bitstream * support for all bitdepth, 8, 10 and 12bits * support for all chroma subsamplings 4:2:0, 4:2:2, 4:4:4 and grayscale * full acceleration for AVX-2 64bits processors * partial acceleration for SSSE3 processors * partial acceleration for NEON processors This package is maintained by Debian Multimedia Team at https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/dav1d
