Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-10-04 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi again!

On 2019-09-06 at 10:51 (+02), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I don't know if you noticed but ilmbase causes a regression in an
> autopkgtest as
> noted in [1], which will block its testing migration and thus the two
> transitions.

Meanwhile, with today upload of OpenImageIO to unstable/sid fixing
#941362, the final bits of this transition should be in their place to
complete the process.

Thanks for your patience and time.

Cheers.


-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/09/2019 17:09, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Jonathan!
> 
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:07 AM Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
>> Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can
>> deal with that if it arises.
> 
> Ilmbase and OpenEXR both uploaded to unstable/sid.

I don't know if you noticed but ilmbase causes a regression in an autopkgtest as
noted in [1], which will block its testing migration and thus the two 
transitions.

Emilio

[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ilmbase.html



Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-02 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Jonathan!

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:07 AM Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
> Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can
> deal with that if it arises.

Ilmbase and OpenEXR both uploaded to unstable/sid.

Cheers.


-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A



Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:52:39PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> So, all FTBFS are not related to Ilmbase/OpenEXR.
> Let me know if it's ok to go on with this transition.

Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can
deal with that if it arises.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51



Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:52:39PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> 
> So, all FTBFS are not related to Ilmbase/OpenEXR.
> Let me know if it's ok to go on with this transition.

Ok, looking good. I'd like to hold off for now and get a few of the
transitions in progress out of the way first though.



-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51



Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-27 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi again!

On 2019-08-25 at 14:15 (+01), Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

[...]

> Is this transition ready to go?

Here are the results for the complete rebuild of reverse dependencies,
both for ilmbase and openexr libraries:

* aqsis_1.8.2-11 => OK
* blender_2.80+dfsg-3 => OK
* calligra_1:3.1.0+dfsg-5 => OK
* darktable_2.6.0-1 => FTBFS[0]
* exactimage_1.0.2-3 => OK
* freeimage_3.18.0+ds2-1 => OK
* gegl_0.4.14-1 => OK
* gimp_2.10.8-2 => OK
* gmic_2.4.5-1 => OK
* gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.16.0-2 => OK
* hugin_2019.0.0+dfsg-2 => OK
* imagemagick_8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1 => OK
* k3d_0.8.0.6-8 => OK
* kimageformats_5.54.0-1 => OK
* kio-extras_4:18.08.3-1 => OK
* krita_1:4.2.5+dfsg-1 => OK
* libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg1-2 => OK
* luminance-hdr_2.5.1+dfsg-4 => OK
* mia_2.4.6-4 => OK
* nvidia-texture-tools_2.0.8-1+dfsg-8.1 => OK
* opencv_3.2.0+dfsg-6 => FTBFS[1]
* openexr-viewers_1.0.1-6 => OK
* openimageio_2.0.10~dfsg0-1 => OK
* openvdb_5.2.0-5.1 => OK
* pfstools_2.1.0-4 => FTBFS[2]
* povray_1:3.7.0.8-1 => OK
* synfig_1.2.2-1 => OK
* vips_8.7.4-1 => FTBFS [unsatisfied dependencies]

[0]
/<>/src/external/rawspeed/src/librawspeed/decompressors/VC5Decompressor.cpp:701:9:
 error: enclosing ‘parallel’
... and following

[1]
In file included from /<>/modules/core/src/hal_internal.cpp:49:
/<>/obj-i386-linux-gnu/opencv_lapack.h:2:10: fatal error: 
LAPACKE_H_PATH-NOTFOUND/lapacke.h: No such file or directory

[2]
dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "usr/share/pfstools/hdrhtml_*" (tried 
in ., debian/tmp)
dh_install: pfstools missing files: usr/share/pfstools/hdrhtml_*
dh_install: missing files, aborting

= = = >8 = = =

So, all FTBFS are not related to Ilmbase/OpenEXR.
Let me know if it's ok to go on with this transition.

Cheers.


-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-26 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi!

On 2019-08-25 at 14:15 (+01), Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Is this transition ready to go?

I probably need to re-test some of the reverse dependencies.
Give me a bunch of days and I'll ping you back with the results.


-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi,

On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 09:47:43PM +0100, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package.
> 
> On January 1st, 2019 a fixed testing-purpose package (2.3.0-4) has been
> uploaded to experimental.
> 
> So, following a checklist obtained via 'reverse-depends', here is the
> list of source packages depending on openexr and the results of the test
> builds (honoring the dependency levels as reported in the checklist, as
> relevant for the correct order):

Is this transition ready to go?

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51



Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-01-02 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi!

This is a follow-up with an update on packages involved in the
transition.

On 2019-01-01 at 21:47 (+01), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> ### Dependency level 2 ###

> [...]

>  * openimageio_1.8.15~dfsg0-1 => FTBFS

This is 'openimageio_2.0.3~dfsg0-3' now. Gonna test it later today.

> [...]

> ### Dependency level 4 ###
>  * blender_2.79+dfsg0-5 => OK

This is 'blender_2.79.b+dfsg0-6' now. Gonna test it too.

Cheers.


-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-01-01 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, ma...@debian.org

Dear Release Team,

I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package.

On January 1st, 2019 a fixed testing-purpose package (2.3.0-4) has been
uploaded to experimental.

So, following a checklist obtained via 'reverse-depends', here is the
list of source packages depending on openexr and the results of the test
builds (honoring the dependency levels as reported in the checklist, as
relevant for the correct order):

### Dependency level 2 ###
 * aqsis_1.8.2-11 => OK
 * calligra_1:3.1.0+dfsg-4 => OK
 * darktable_2.6.0-1 => OK
 * enblend-enfuse_4.2-4 => FTBFS (Level 3)
 * exactimage_1.0.1-3 => OK
 * freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-5 => OK
 * gegl_0.4.12-2 => OK
 * gimp_2.10.8-2 => OK
 * imagemagick_8:6.9.10.14+dfsg-7 => OK
 * k3d_0.8.0.6-8 => OK
 * kde-runtime_4:17.08.3-2 => FTBFS (missing file)
 * kimageformats_5.51.0-1 => OK
 * kio-extras_4:18.08.3-1 => OK
 * krita_1:4.1.7+dfsg-1 => OK
 * libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg1-1 => OK
 * luminance-hdr_2.5.1+dfsg-3 => OK
 * mia_2.4.6-3 => OK
 * nvidia-texture-tools_2.0.8-1+dfsg-8.1 => OK
 * opencv_3.2.0+dfsg-5 => FTBFS (missing file)
 * openexr-viewers_1.0.1-6 => OK
 * openimageio_1.8.15~dfsg0-1 => FTBFS
 * openvdb_5.2.0-5 => OK
 * povray_1:3.7.0.8-1 => OK

### Dependency level 3 ###
 * gmic_2.4.2-2 => FTBFS (Level 2)
 * gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.14.4-1 => OK
 * hugin_2018.0.0+dfsg-3 => FTBFS (Level 2)
 * pfstools_2.1.0-3 => FTBFS (missing file)
 * synfig_1.2.1-0.1 => OK
 * vips_8.7.2-1 => FTBFS (build environment fail)

### Dependency level 4 ###
 * blender_2.79+dfsg0-5 => OK

'Level {2,3}' tags mean that the package fails because its build depends
on another package that is part of the transition and need to get
rebuilt before that same package, e.g. libvigraimpex.

I'll follow-up this bug report with any progress in fixing the packages
that are FTBFS.

Thanks for your time and patience.

mfv

Ben file:

title = "openexr";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenexr23" | .depends ~ "libopenexr24";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenexr24";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenexr23";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 
'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature