Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:05:11AM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > Hi Ross, > > > > I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update > > powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down. > > > > I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on > > salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new > > version? > > > > Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you > > want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that > > Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship? > > Oh thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten all about it. I reached out to Jose > in January to propose collab-maint and never got a response. I hadn't gotten > as far as uploading or maintaining. The repo salsa probably has more changes > than appropriate for an NMU. It'd be reasonable to salvage at this point > though. > > Were you hoping to maintain? I'd be happy to transfer the repo. I'm also > happy to file an ITS and move it to collaborative maintenance. I were hoping to maintain indeed, but more maintainers is better! While I am at it I can file the ITS and setup the collab-maint repo. Thanks, Kanru > Ross > > Attachments: > * signature.asc
Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:05:11AM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Hi Ross, > > I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update > powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down. > > I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on > salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new > version? > > Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you > want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that > Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship? Oh thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten all about it. I reached out to Jose in January to propose collab-maint and never got a response. I hadn't gotten as far as uploading or maintaining. The repo salsa probably has more changes than appropriate for an NMU. It'd be reasonable to salvage at this point though. Were you hoping to maintain? I'd be happy to transfer the repo. I'm also happy to file an ITS and move it to collaborative maintenance. Ross signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available
Hi Ross, I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down. I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new version? Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship? Cheers, Kanru On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 04:29:32PM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > Package: powertop > Version: 2.8-1+b2 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > The latest version 2.8-1 in Debian is very old. Upstream has released > 2.10 recently, please consider package it. > > Cheers, > Kanru > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers unstable-debug > APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN > Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > Versions of packages powertop depends on: > ii libc6 2.28-7 > ii libgcc1 1:8.2.0-21 > ii libncurses6 6.1+20181013-2 > ii libncursesw6 6.1+20181013-2 > ii libnl-3-200 3.4.0-1 > ii libnl-genl-3-200 3.4.0-1 > ii libpci3 1:3.5.2-1 > ii libstdc++68.2.0-21 > ii libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2 > > powertop recommends no packages. > > Versions of packages powertop suggests: > pn cpufrequtils > pn laptop-mode-tools > > -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available
Package: powertop Version: 2.8-1+b2 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The latest version 2.8-1 in Debian is very old. Upstream has released 2.10 recently, please consider package it. Cheers, Kanru -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages powertop depends on: ii libc6 2.28-7 ii libgcc1 1:8.2.0-21 ii libncurses6 6.1+20181013-2 ii libncursesw6 6.1+20181013-2 ii libnl-3-200 3.4.0-1 ii libnl-genl-3-200 3.4.0-1 ii libpci3 1:3.5.2-1 ii libstdc++68.2.0-21 ii libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2 powertop recommends no packages. Versions of packages powertop suggests: pn cpufrequtils pn laptop-mode-tools -- no debconf information
