Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available

2019-07-07 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:05:11AM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> > Hi Ross,
> > 
> > I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update
> > powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down.
> > 
> > I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on
> > salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new
> > version?
> > 
> > Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you
> > want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that
> > Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship?
> 
> Oh thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten all about it.  I reached out to Jose
> in January to propose collab-maint and never got a response.  I hadn't gotten
> as far as uploading or maintaining.  The repo salsa probably has more changes
> than appropriate for an NMU.  It'd be reasonable to salvage at this point
> though.
> 
> Were you hoping to maintain?  I'd be happy to transfer the repo.  I'm also
> happy to file an ITS and move it to collaborative maintenance.

I were hoping to maintain indeed, but more maintainers is better!

While I am at it I can file the ITS and setup the collab-maint repo.

Thanks,
Kanru

> Ross
> 
> Attachments:
> * signature.asc



Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available

2019-07-07 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:05:11AM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Hi Ross,
> 
> I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update
> powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down.
> 
> I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on
> salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new
> version?
> 
> Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you
> want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that
> Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship?

Oh thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten all about it.  I reached out to Jose
in January to propose collab-maint and never got a response.  I hadn't gotten
as far as uploading or maintaining.  The repo salsa probably has more changes
than appropriate for an NMU.  It'd be reasonable to salvage at this point
though.

Were you hoping to maintain?  I'd be happy to transfer the repo.  I'm also
happy to file an ITS and move it to collaborative maintenance.

Ross


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available

2019-07-07 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Hi Ross,

I opened this bug in February. I was going to prepare a NMU to update
powertop to 2.10 but the official website was down.

I revisited this again today and found you have a repository on
salsa.d.o that looks quite complete. Do you intent to upload a new
version?

Jose (ghostbar@) if you read this mail, could you let us know if you
want to continue to maintain the powertop package or you're OK that
Ross or myself take over the maintainer-ship?

Cheers,
Kanru

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 04:29:32PM +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Package: powertop
> Version: 2.8-1+b2
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> The latest version 2.8-1 in Debian is very old. Upstream has released
> 2.10 recently, please consider package it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kanru
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: buster/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
> Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
> LANGUAGE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
> 
> Versions of packages powertop depends on:
> ii  libc6 2.28-7
> ii  libgcc1   1:8.2.0-21
> ii  libncurses6   6.1+20181013-2
> ii  libncursesw6  6.1+20181013-2
> ii  libnl-3-200   3.4.0-1
> ii  libnl-genl-3-200  3.4.0-1
> ii  libpci3   1:3.5.2-1
> ii  libstdc++68.2.0-21
> ii  libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2
> 
> powertop recommends no packages.
> 
> Versions of packages powertop suggests:
> pn  cpufrequtils   
> pn  laptop-mode-tools  
> 
> -- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#923025: powertop: New version 2.10 is available

2019-02-22 Thread 陳侃如
Package: powertop
Version: 2.8-1+b2
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

The latest version 2.8-1 in Debian is very old. Upstream has released
2.10 recently, please consider package it.

Cheers,
Kanru

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages powertop depends on:
ii  libc6 2.28-7
ii  libgcc1   1:8.2.0-21
ii  libncurses6   6.1+20181013-2
ii  libncursesw6  6.1+20181013-2
ii  libnl-3-200   3.4.0-1
ii  libnl-genl-3-200  3.4.0-1
ii  libpci3   1:3.5.2-1
ii  libstdc++68.2.0-21
ii  libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2

powertop recommends no packages.

Versions of packages powertop suggests:
pn  cpufrequtils   
pn  laptop-mode-tools  

-- no debconf information