Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-04-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:48:52PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Just for info, from IRC #debian-release today:
> > 
> > [21:03:39] <_rene_> elbrus: I think you are right (ENOSPC on my rpi
> > handling the mail, need to fix it later), looks like remains of hackery
> > working around Java broken with stack clash fix on i386
> > 
> > [21:04:48] <_rene_>   ifeq "$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)" "i386"
> > [21:04:48] <_rene_> JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS := openjdk-8-jre (>=
> > 8u151-b12-2~) | openjdk-9-jre (>= 9.0.1+11-1~)
> > [21:04:51] <_rene_>   else
> > [21:04:51] <_rene_> [...]
> 
> Jup, will remove.

Fixed in 1:6.1.5-2
 
Regards,
 
Rene



Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-04-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
clone 925321 -1
reassign -1 src:libreoffice
severity -1 important
retitle -1 obsolete openjdk-8 dependency
block 925321 by -1
thanks

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Just for info, from IRC #debian-release today:
> 
> [21:03:39] <_rene_> elbrus: I think you are right (ENOSPC on my rpi
> handling the mail, need to fix it later), looks like remains of hackery
> working around Java broken with stack clash fix on i386
> 
> [21:04:48] <_rene_>   ifeq "$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)" "i386"
> [21:04:48] <_rene_> JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS := openjdk-8-jre (>=
> 8u151-b12-2~) | openjdk-9-jre (>= 9.0.1+11-1~)
> [21:04:51] <_rene_>   else
> [21:04:51] <_rene_> [...]

Jup, will remove.

Regards,

Rene



Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-04-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Just for info, from IRC #debian-release today:

[21:03:39] <_rene_> elbrus: I think you are right (ENOSPC on my rpi
handling the mail, need to fix it later), looks like remains of hackery
working around Java broken with stack clash fix on i386

[21:04:48] <_rene_>   ifeq "$(DEB_HOST_ARCH)" "i386"
[21:04:48] <_rene_> JAVA_RUNTIME_DEPENDS := openjdk-8-jre (>=
8u151-b12-2~) | openjdk-9-jre (>= 9.0.1+11-1~)
[21:04:51] <_rene_>   else
[21:04:51] <_rene_> [...]

Paul



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-04-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Andreas,

On 02-04-2019 16:36, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> trying: -openjdk-8
> skipped: -openjdk-8 (0, 1, 6)
> got: 34+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-32:m-0:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1
> * i386: libreoffice-officebean, libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb

https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice-officebean and
https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb
also show:
dep: openjdk-8-jre (>= 8u151-b12-2~) [i386]
OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspot JIT
or openjdk-9-jre (>= 9.0.1+11-1~)
Package not available

Which would explain why britney doesn't want to remove openjdk-8, but it
would also suggest that libreoffice-officebean and
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb are currently broken in unstable on i386.

I am not sure if I am interpreting this correctly.

Paul



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-04-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: reopen -1

On 2019-03-23 07:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 23-03-2019 02:37, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> please kick openjdk-8 out of testing, finally it has no rdepends left.
>>
>> The version skew w.r.t. stable, i.e. stretch has a newer version than
>> buster, blocks a lot of piuparts stretch->buster upgrade tests.
> 
> This should be handled in unstable. I have updated bug 915620 for this.

The removal from unstable does not propagate to testing ...

trying: -openjdk-8
skipped: -openjdk-8 (0, 1, 6)
got: 34+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-32:m-0:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1
* i386: libreoffice-officebean, libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb

anbe@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn -s testing openjdk-8
Will remove the following packages from testing:

 openjdk-8 | 8u212-b01-1 | source
openjdk-8-dbg | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-demo | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, 
mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-doc | 8u212-b01-1 | all
openjdk-8-jdk | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-jdk-headless | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, 
mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-jre | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-jre-headless | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, 
mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-8-jre-zero | 8u212-b01-1 | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el
openjdk-8-source | 8u212-b01-1 | all

Maintainer: OpenJDK Team 

--- Reason ---

--

Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.


Andreas



Bug#925321: RM: openjdk-8/8u171-b11-2

2019-03-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi,

please kick openjdk-8 out of testing, finally it has no rdepends left.

The version skew w.r.t. stable, i.e. stretch has a newer version than
buster, blocks a lot of piuparts stretch->buster upgrade tests.


Andreas