Bug#925568: Bug#925568: cnvkit: FTBFS: FileExistsError: [Errno 17] File exists: 'build/'
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:38:12AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > As we are in freeze, should we ask release team to unblock transition > > and then push to unstable? > > Yes, please do so. You can first push to unstable and then open an unblock request. This *is* a big issue, the bug is RC, and the package would be removed from buster otherwise. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#925568: Bug#925568: cnvkit: FTBFS: FileExistsError: [Errno 17] File exists: 'build/'
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:10:39AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a
> > sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
>
> I just did a try on buster.
>
> It succeeded first time, not on a second rebuild (with same error).
I also was able to reproduce the error in a buster chroot (at first
try). I was thinking whether --no-parallel might have helped as well
since this is a usual cause for non-predictable racing conditions.
I actually succeeded with
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 66f96f8..8b15674 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ override_dh_auto_build:
mv $${script} cnvkit-$${script%%.py}; \
done; \
fi
- dh_auto_build
+ dh_auto_build --no-parallel
cd scripts && for script in cnvkit-*; do \
mv $${script} $${script##cnvkit-}.py; \
done
> I fixed and tested on buster with new patch d/patches/controldir. Git is
> up-to-date and in UNRELEASED state.
Seems your fix goes more to the root of the issue so we should go
with this.
> As we are in freeze, should we ask release team to unblock transition
> and then push to unstable?
Yes, please do so.
> Though not a bug issue, bug could be forwarded upstream as it raises an
> error to use an existing dir.
Probably.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
