Bug#925898: [t-p-u, pre-approval] unblock: highwayhash/0~git20181002.c5ee50b-4
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Mo, On 28-03-2019 06:06, Mo Zhou wrote: > Please unblock package highwayhash > > (explain the reason for the unblock here) > > The C++ symbols changed somehow since the -3 upload, which > renders dpkg-gensymbols failure. I am sure there are people on the release team that are more knowledgeable about C++ symbols, but it really helps the whole team if you would explain why you believe, or what you did to investigate if, it is harmless to remove this symbol. > However, the newer snapshot > in sid FTBFS on arm* so it would not migrate even if I fixed > the symbol lists. That means, well unfortunately, I have to > go through testing-proposed-updates. "have to" is a bit strong. You could nearly always go with a "+really" version an revert the new snapshot. (Not saying you have to do that, but it is an option and going through unstable is a lot better for QA and the team.) > Does it worth the effort to save the package for Buster? > src:highwayhash's popcon is quite low (~ 10), and it has > no reverse dependency in the archive except src:tensorflow. > > If RT doesn't bother dealing with such a t-p-u case, > please feel free to close this bug and I'm totally fine > with that. > > (include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing) > > The difference will be merely some C++ symbol updates. > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924840 Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#925898: [t-p-u, pre-approval] unblock: highwayhash/0~git20181002.c5ee50b-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package highwayhash (explain the reason for the unblock here) The C++ symbols changed somehow since the -3 upload, which renders dpkg-gensymbols failure. However, the newer snapshot in sid FTBFS on arm* so it would not migrate even if I fixed the symbol lists. That means, well unfortunately, I have to go through testing-proposed-updates. Does it worth the effort to save the package for Buster? src:highwayhash's popcon is quite low (~ 10), and it has no reverse dependency in the archive except src:tensorflow. If RT doesn't bother dealing with such a t-p-u case, please feel free to close this bug and I'm totally fine with that. (include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing) The difference will be merely some C++ symbol updates. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924840 unblock highwayhash/0~git20181002.c5ee50b-4 -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled