Bug#929129: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#929129: Xen Hypervisor security update for Intel MDS - XSA 297

2019-05-19 Thread Wiebe Cazemier
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 12:18, Hans van Kranenburg  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 5/17/19 5:21 PM, Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
> > Package: xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64
> > Version: 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11
> >
> > All Xen Hypervisor packages also need patches against the Intel MDS bug,
> > same as https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-.
> >
> > http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-297.html
>
> Yes, they do.
>
> For Xen 4.8 and 4.11, we're currently waiting for the related changes in
> the upstream code branches to complete the regular test process at Xen
> (compile, run on all different hardware etc).
>
> Only at the moment that the advisary is published, the patches are
> committed to the public development branches. After that, the tests do
> more rigorous regression testing than the developer writing them could
> do. We tend to wait for this to succeed. E.g. as part of the packaging
> team, I can test that the result boots on amd64, but I have no idea
> myself if it also runs on arm etc.
>
> If you're desperately in need for an intermediate version, and you're
> able to build debian packages yourself, then I can point you at
> something that I'm running myself now.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>

No rush in that sense. The bugreport was precipitated by the lack of any
mention of Xen in Ubuntu's en Debian's security announcements, while Qemu
and libvirt were.


Bug#929129: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#929129: Xen Hypervisor security update for Intel MDS - XSA 297

2019-05-18 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
Hi,

On 5/17/19 5:21 PM, Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
> Package: xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64
> Version: 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11
> 
> All Xen Hypervisor packages also need patches against the Intel MDS bug,
> same as https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-. 
> 
> http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-297.html

Yes, they do.

For Xen 4.8 and 4.11, we're currently waiting for the related changes in
the upstream code branches to complete the regular test process at Xen
(compile, run on all different hardware etc).

Only at the moment that the advisary is published, the patches are
committed to the public development branches. After that, the tests do
more rigorous regression testing than the developer writing them could
do. We tend to wait for this to succeed. E.g. as part of the packaging
team, I can test that the result boots on amd64, but I have no idea
myself if it also runs on arm etc.

If you're desperately in need for an intermediate version, and you're
able to build debian packages yourself, then I can point you at
something that I'm running myself now.

Regards,
Hans