Bug#931593: gdbm-l10n should not be Important

2019-07-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov 


control: tags -1 confirmed help

[2019-07-07 18:36] Mike Bird 
> part   text/plain 503
> Package: gdbm-l10n
> Version: 1.18.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> I suspect the "Priority: important" for gdbm-l10n/buster is a mistake.

Definitely. Funny thing is that I have no idea where does it come from,
the only priority declaration I have in source package is

Priority: optional

in first paragraph.
-- 
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.
Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.

Bug#931593: gdbm-l10n should not be Important

2019-07-07 Thread Mike Bird 
Package: gdbm-l10n
Version: 1.18.1-4
Severity: normal

I suspect the "Priority: important" for gdbm-l10n/buster is a mistake.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (2000, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-0.bpo.5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

-- no debconf information