Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
That's great news! Thank you Seunghun for acting on it so promptly. Cheers.
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Hi all, I'm so sorry for letting you wait. I have packaged and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net [1]. I also have sent the RFS [2] to the mailing list. I hope one of Debian developers supports it to get involved in sid. Best regards, Seunghun [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/ [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997016 On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:57 AM Tom W wrote: > Is anyone looking into this? I sense increasing demand for swtpm + > qemu for Win 11 VM. >
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Is anyone looking into this? I sense increasing demand for swtpm + qemu for Win 11 VM.
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
What happened to this? What exactly is the bottleneck and is there any room to help get this over the line? Considering Windows 11 VMs pretty much require TPM and this is necessary for that through libvirt I think it's something that should we should try to get in the repo before the Windows 11 launch. For the record I was able to install Nick's packages and functionality is working as expected on sid. Thanks, Ian
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
I've sent pull requests [1, 2] to the maintainer to upgrade his work-in-progress packages to the latest upstream versions, as well as overhaul the Debian packaging--these should be pretty much production-quality now. I upstreamed some of the patches while I was at it, too. Additionally, I've created binary Bullseye releases of libtpms v0.8.4 [3] and swtpm v0.6.0 [4] in my forked repositories for anyone who'd like to try them out now. Nick -- [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libtpms/-/merge_requests [2] https://salsa.debian.org/kkamagui/swtpm/-/merge_requests [3] https://salsa.debian.org/nchevsky/libtpms/-/releases/debian%252F0.8.4-1.0 [4] https://salsa.debian.org/nchevsky/swtpm/-/releases/debian%252F0.6.0-1.0
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Hey guys, is there anything news or a ETA? 3 months later and still not a package available. Cheers, fossdd
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Hi Seunghun, > Thank you for the notification. I am still working on this and > would finish it soon. Let me know if you need some kind of help or something. I'll be happy to help and thanks for working on this! - u
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:16 AM Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Control: unblock 941199 by 958509 > > On 2020-04-17 Seunghun Han wrote: > [...] > > Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt, > > > I would like to package this one. > > > Best regards, > > Hello Seunghun, > > are you still working on this or should I retitle this to ITP? Hello Andreas, Thank you for the notification. I am still working on this and would finish it soon. Best regards, Seunghun > cu Andreas
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Control: unblock 941199 by 958509 On 2020-04-17 Seunghun Han wrote: [...] > Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt, > I would like to package this one. > Best regards, Hello Seunghun, are you still working on this or should I retitle this to ITP? cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:42 +0100 Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users > reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to > ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was > there more going on in the background that is missing here? > Dear Laurent Bigonville and Christian Ehrhardt, I would like to package this one. Best regards, Seunghun
Bug#941199: Upstream has valid debian packaging
Hi, since [1] seems to have valid packaging content and I've had a few users reporting to use that for a while and it works well. Therefore I wanted to ask what this might be missing - just someone who does the dput or was there more going on in the background that is missing here? P.S. I did a similar bump to probe for the status of this at the upstream [2] project [1]: https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/tree/master/debian [2]: https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/issues/216 -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
