Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:23:49AM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote: > samba (2:4.9.11+dfsg-1~deb10u1) unstable; urgency=medium
"unstable" seems like the wrong target. > > [ Mathieu Parent ] > * New upstream release > - Bump ldb Build-Depends to 2:1.5.1+really1.4.7 > - Fixes printing via smbspool backend with kerberos auth (Closes: #931481) > - Drop security patches, merged upstream > - libsamba-passdb.so bumped to 0.27.2 > * Enable vfs_nfs4acl_xattr (Closes: #930540) > > [ Rafael David Tinoco ] > * debian/rules: Make DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU initialized through dpkg-architecture > (Closes: #931138) > * CTDB NFS fixes (Closes: #929931, LP: #722201): > - d/p/fix-nfs-service-name-to-nfs-kernel-server.patch: change nfs service > name from nfs to nfs-kernel-server > - ctdb-config: depend on /etc/ctdb/nodes file > - d/ctdb.install, d/rules: create ctdb run directory into tmpfiles.d to > allow pid file to exist > - added /var/lib/ctdb/* directories > - d/ctdb.postrm: remove leftovers from /var/lib/ctdb/* > - Add examples of NFS HA CTDB config files + helper script > > -- Mathieu Parent <sath...@debian.org> Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:56:36 +0200 > > samba is the latest 4.9.x upstream release (4.9 is in maint mode until > mid-september, see [1]). It includes a lot of stability fixes, including > crashes, memory leaks and #931481. The included security fixes were already in > Debian. > > I added an useful vfs module (vfs_nfs4acl_xattr). No regression risk here > (#930540). > On its face this doesn't sound suitable for stable. > I also added the CTDB NFS improvements from Ubuntu. CTDB NFS was broken > before, > so no regression expected ;-). > Neither does this, unless the brokenness is a regression from stretch. > I only attach the diff of the debian directory. > We'd need to see the full set of changes, please. Also, before taking on a big set of changes, a description of what QA, automated or otherwise, is happening or has happened with these changes, would be useful. Both upstream and Debian-side. Cheers, Julien