Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra
Hello, On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 08:37PM +01, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: libgl1 > Version: 1.1.0-1+b1 > Severity: normal > > Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest > Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming > priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with > a lower priority. I thought we systematically altered everything extra->optional in dak. Anyway, have run 'dak override' for this now. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra
On 4.12.2019 19.23, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Timo Aaltonen dixit: > >> That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the >> wrong package? Same thing with the other bug. > > No, definitely checked the two packages. > > Did you remember to request ftpmasters to change Priority > in the override file after you changed them in the package? > ftpmasters determine Section and Priority in the archive, > not the packages themselves. No, I didn't change the package myself back then, and in any case, it's not a package bug anymore. -- t
Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra
Timo Aaltonen dixit: >That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the >wrong package? Same thing with the other bug. No, definitely checked the two packages. Did you remember to request ftpmasters to change Priority in the override file after you changed them in the package? ftpmasters determine Section and Priority in the archive, not the packages themselves. bye, //mirabilos -- Beware of ritual lest you forget the meaning behind it. yeah but it means if you really care about something, don't ritualise it, or you will lose it. don't fetishise it, don't obsess. or you'll forget why you love it in the first place.
Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra
On 1.12.2019 21.37, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: libgl1 > Version: 1.1.0-1+b1 > Severity: normal > > Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest > Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming > priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with > a lower priority. That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the wrong package? Same thing with the other bug. -- t
Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra
Package: libgl1 Version: 1.1.0-1+b1 Severity: normal Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with a lower priority. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers buildd-unstable APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages libgl1 is related to: pn libgl1-nvidia-glx-any