Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra

2022-08-09 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello,

On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 08:37PM +01, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> Package: libgl1
> Version: 1.1.0-1+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest
> Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming
> priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with
> a lower priority.

I thought we systematically altered everything extra->optional in dak.

Anyway, have run 'dak override' for this now.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra

2019-12-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 4.12.2019 19.23, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Timo Aaltonen dixit:
> 
>> That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the
>> wrong package? Same thing with the other bug.
> 
> No, definitely checked the two packages.
> 
> Did you remember to request ftpmasters to change Priority
> in the override file after you changed them in the package?
> ftpmasters determine Section and Priority in the archive,
> not the packages themselves.

No, I didn't change the package myself back then, and in any case, it's
not a package bug anymore.


-- 
t



Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra

2019-12-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Timo Aaltonen dixit:

>That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the
>wrong package? Same thing with the other bug.

No, definitely checked the two packages.

Did you remember to request ftpmasters to change Priority
in the override file after you changed them in the package?
ftpmasters determine Section and Priority in the archive,
not the packages themselves.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
 Beware of ritual lest you forget the meaning behind it.
 yeah but it means if you really care about something, don't
ritualise it, or you will lose it. don't fetishise it, don't
obsess. or you'll forget why you love it in the first place.



Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra

2019-12-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 1.12.2019 21.37, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: libgl1
> Version: 1.1.0-1+b1
> Severity: normal
> 
> Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest
> Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming
> priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with
> a lower priority.

That was done over two years ago in 1.0.0-1, so you are looking at the
wrong package? Same thing with the other bug.


-- 
t



Bug#945962: libgl1: still uses Priority: extra

2019-12-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: libgl1
Version: 1.1.0-1+b1
Severity: normal

Please change Priority extra to optional, in accordance with latest
Policy, as to not make packages depending on libgl1 but of a conforming
priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with
a lower priority.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers buildd-unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages libgl1 is related to:
pn  libgl1-nvidia-glx-any